Conducting a literature review means
Page of the "literature review tutorial" ate page for screenreader to page inginformation on borrowing, renewals and requests for g hourscheck your library’s opening ncinghelp with referencing your exam paperspast exam papers are useful for exam inginformation on borrowing, renewals and requests for y resources for moodlehelp with adding online resources to moodle ation literacydiscover how the library can assist you to help your students improve their research librariesour locations and e charterour service commitment to ateour plans, reports and tsour contact inginformation on borrowing, renewals and requests for chers tool kitdetailed advice for starting your research ecquniversity's online research continue your access to the ity borrowersjoin the cquniversity ts from other universitiesjoin the cquniversity l collectionsinformation about unique collections held in the library. Literature review ture review pages have been developed by staff at cquniversity to help postgraduate students conceptualize, research and write a literature review. The pages are intended as a guide and it is the responsibility of the supervisor to give updated: sep 30, updatesemail is a literature review? Literature review is an evaluative report of information found in the literature related to your selected area of study. Literature review is more than the search for information, and goes beyond being a descriptive annotated bibliography. All works included in the review must be read, evaluated and analysed (which you would do for an annotated bibliography), but relationships between the literature must also be identified and articulated, in relation to your field of research. In writing the literature review, the purpose is to convey to the reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. Selection of books available at cqunilibrary to assist you with preparing a literature review:conducting research literature reviews: from the internet to paper - arlene finkcall number: 001.
How to conduct a literature review
19/2005isbn: 141290904xdoing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide - helen aveyardcall number: 808. 6isbn: 0335222617doing a literature review : releasing the social science research imagination - chris hartcall number: 300. 176isbn: sity research & information service kiosk at your our library us - 1300 666 d by springshare; all rights a tech support this page in a format suitable for printers and screen-readers or mobile ersity cricos provider codes: qld-00219c; nsw-01315f; paperwrite to conduct ments with is a literature review? Shuttleworth 564k this page on your website:Many students are instructed, as part of their research program, to perform a literature review, without always understanding what a literature review article is a part of the guide:Select from one of the other courses available:Experimental ty and ical tion and psychology e projects for ophy of sance & tics beginners tical bution in er 30 more articles on this 't miss these related articles:2quantitative and qualitative research. Literature review can be a precursor in the introduction of a research paper, or it can be an entire paper in itself, often the first stage of large research projects, allowing the supervisor to ascertain that the student is on the correct path. A good literature review should also have some evaluation of the quality and findings of the research. Good literature review should avoid the temptation of impressing the importance of a particular research program. They want to be re-assured that it is a serious paper, not a pseudo-scientific sales some literature reviews can be presented in a chronological order, it is best example, a review of victorian age physics, could present j.
Otherwise, this is usually perceived as being a little lazy, and it is better to organize the review around ideas and individual a general rule, certainly for a longer review, each paragraph should address one point, and present and evaluate all of the evidence, from all of the differing points of ting a literature review evaluating the credibility of sources is one of the most difficult aspects, especially with the ease of finding information on the only real way to evaluate is through experience, but there are a few tricks for evaluating information quickly, yet is such a thing as ‘too much information,’ and google does not distinguish or judge the quality of results, only how search engine friendly a paper is. Failure to do this will completely invalidate the literature review and potentially undermine the research project. Check into the credentials of any source upon which you rely heavily for the literature review. It may be a little extra work for them, but there will be even more work if they have to tear apart a review because it is built upon shaky ting a good literature review is a matter of experience, and even the best scientists have fallen into the trap of using poor evidence. Are free to copy, share and adapt any text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this to write an introduction - introducing the research ch designs - how to construct an experiment or atic reviews - evaluating previous g an abstract - how to write a ch paper outline explorable? Take it with you wherever you research council of ibe to our rss blakstad on chacademicwrite paperfor kidsself-helpsitecodelogintop ign upprivacy paperwrite to conduct ments with is a literature review? Take it with you wherever you research council of ibe to our rss blakstad on are free to copy, share and adapt any text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this ign upprivacy wikipedia, the free to: navigation, a focused scientific review with pre-defined methodology, see systematic has been suggested that this article be merged into review article. Literature review is a text of a scholarly paper, which includes the current knowledge including substantive findings, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic.
Most often associated with academic-oriented literature, such reviews are found in academic journals, and are not to be confused with book reviews that may also appear in the same publication. 1][unreliable source] a narrow-scope literature review may be included as part of a peer-reviewed journal article presenting new research, serving to situate the current study within the body of the relevant literature and to provide context for the reader. In such a case, the review usually precedes the methodology and results sections of the ing a literature review may also be part of graduate and post-graduate student work, including in the preparation of a thesis, dissertation, or a journal article. Literature reviews are also common in a research proposal or prospectus (the document that is approved before a student formally begins a dissertation or thesis). Fourth type, the systematic review, is often classified separately, but is essentially a literature review focused on a research question, trying to identify, appraise, select and synthesize all high-quality research evidence and arguments relevant to that question. A meta-analysis is typically a systematic review using statistical methods to effectively combine the data used on all selected studies to produce a more reliable result. And rangarajan (2013) distinguish between the process of reviewing the literature and a finished work or product known as a literature review. 5]:193–229 the process of reviewing the literature is often ongoing and informs many aspects of the empirical research project.
Scholars need to be scanning the literature long after a formal literature review product appears to be completed. The process of reviewing the literature requires different kinds of activities and ways of thinking. 6] shields and rangarajan (2013) and granello (2001) link the activities of doing a literature review with benjamin bloom’s revised taxonomy of the cognitive domain (ways of thinking: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating). For a person doing a literature review this would include tasks such as recognition, retrieval and recollection of the relevant literature. Understanding may be challenging because the literature could introduce the scholar to new terminology, conceptual framework and methodology. In bloom’s third category applying the scholar is able to make connections between the literature and his or her larger research project. This is particularly true if the literature review is to be a chapter in a future empirical study. Analysis of the literature allows the scholar to develop frameworks for analysis and the ability to see the big picture and know how details from the literature fit within the big picture.
When scholars use bloom’s fifth category evaluating they are able to see the strengths and weaknesses of the theories, arguments, methodology and findings of the literature they have collected and read. 7] when scholars engage in creating the final category in bloom's taxonomy, they bring creativity to the process of doing a literature review. They may be able to find a fresh and original research question, identify a heretofore, unknown gap in the literature or make surprising connections. By understanding how ways of thinking connect to tasks of a literature review, a scholar is able to be self-reflective and bring metacognition to the process of reviewing the literature. The process of reviewing the literature and writing a literature review can be complicated and lengthy. Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: using bloom's taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Writing literature reviews: a guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (6th ed. A non-profit wikipedia, the free to: navigation, a focused scientific review with pre-defined methodology, see systematic has been suggested that this article be merged into review article.