Love research paper
Of us have felt powerfully attracted to and in "love" with somebody more than once in our lives. To make sense of the raw emotion experienced during such times, we invariably turn to culturally-mediated constructs—love at first sight, true love, christian love, etc. Sociologists in turn try to make sense of each amid love and attraction's unique features, and shed light on our underlying motives for and subjective experience of desire. And for good reason, for there are few experiences that match its intensity, that bring us more delight and despair, that confound and conflict us ds agape; conjugal love; dyadic relationship; eros; ideal-types; impression management; ludus; mania; pragma; romantic love; storge; symbolic ic love defies easy explanation. Very few of us, if pressed, could list the exact reasons why we have fallen in love with one person and not another. Love, however, is as much an idea as it is an expression of an instinctive drive and therefore a subject of great interest to sociologists as well as psychoanalysts. Like a script an actor works from in creating a character, these models cue us as to how best to win the admiration, acceptance, and love we hunger after. Some researchers believe people look for qualities in a loved one they themselves lack but admire and want.
Research paper about love
Romantic love in this instance (the theory goes) disguises a more fundamental motive: the attainment of the ego-ideal by proxy. Romantic love, in effect, may well flow from the same emotional wellspring as conjugal the same token, though, few would dispute that the two also inspire notably dissimilar feeling-states and behavior. Many of us at one time or another have experienced the passion, physical attraction, and idealization of the object of our affections unique to romantic love. Anyone who has ever enjoyed a close friendship, meanwhile, has more than a passing familiarity with the hallmarks of conjugal love: trust, lack of criticalness, mutual appreciation, sharing, loyalty, and genuine knowledge of the other (driscoll, davis & lupetz, 1972). An alternate hypothesis claims that low self-esteem individuals pursue romantic love more fervently for the sense of acceptance and worthiness it here, though, may depend on the innate defensiveness of the person in question. For, the heights of ecstasy and the depths of despair lovers experience resemble the mood swings of bipolar disorder believed to be linked to sudden upswings in the presence of these two se, our mental preoccupation with the beloved resembles the intrusive thinking characteristic of an obsessive-compulsive disorder marked by an increase in dopamine levels and an accompanying decrease in serotonin. Log in cial intelligence in , gender & schaft & resource issues in high performing edia product should all be anda ngozi anda ngozi of us have felt powerfully attracted to and in "love" with somebody more than once in our lives. Log in cial intelligence in , gender & schaft & resource issues in high performing edia product should all be anda ngozi anda ngozi ng research paper topics about love: 23 inspiring of the most important things that you need to know about writing a really good paper is that you must focus on the topic.
The kind of topic that you choose for your research paper will determine so much, especially the grades that you will can follow this link and learn about how to choose some really good titles for your work. This is particularly important when you are looking to save a lot of time, or if you want to learn fast what needs to be following are some brilliant ideas that you can use in the event that you have a paper about love to write. You can learn from such titles, or follow the same structure to come up with some ideas of your own, which will also be is the real definition of true love? A number of ways through which you can show love to n what ills love in s 5 common definitions of love, and contextualize n the treatment of love as illustrated in edna millay’s love is not s how love has been used in popular n how love forms a pattern in s the common misconceptions of love be measured? The power of love in a s the importance of trust in n how toni morrison conceptualizes love in n metamorphosis with reference to s how love is as a result of a complex combination of emotion, culture, psychology and n the ethical concept of love as illustrated by dr. Martin luther king n what construes untraditional s the different forms of love as illustrated in plato’s n the concept of love as illustrated in the reader by bernard schlink. N how photography of love in a variety of forms can be s the dependency of love and the challenges that come with s some of the virtues of love as has been exemplified by s some of the types of love as displayed in twelfth ght © 2017 - all rights up for our newsletters. Research on love and its influence in adult human al my life i have been stereotyped as a “bluestocking”.
So, i was surprised when i was asked to write this article about love and sex in human relationships. The following three years after graduation from the university were spent writing my , here is this topic about love. The topic of love has fascinated scientists, philosophers, historians, poets, playwrights, novelists, and songwriters, as well as all other human beings. It is ironic, that as i am writing this article on saturday in the empty riordan clinic, while drinking tea and eating chocolate that i found a love poem from “romeo and juliet” inside the logical perspective on s psychological science was slow to develop an active interest in love, the past few decades have seen considerable growth in research on the subject. The excellent review of the central and well-established findings from psychologically informed research on love and its influence in adult human relationships is presented in this article:“love. A brief history of love popular contemporary ideas about love can be traced to the classical greek philosophers. Prominent in this regard is plato’s symposium, a systematic and seminal analysis, whose major ideas have probably influenced contemporary work on love more than all subsequent philosophical work the other hand, four major intellectual developments of the 19th and 20th centuries provided key insights that helped shape the agenda for current research and theory of first major intellectual development was the work of charles darwin, who proposed that reproductive success was the central process underlying the evolution of species. Contemporary research and theory on love features many psychodynamic principles that were first introduced by freud, such as the importance of early childhood experiences, the powerful impact of motives operating outside of awareness, the role of defenses in shaping the behavioral expression of motives, and the role of sexuality as a force in human behavior.
Mead’s vivid descriptions of cultural variations in the expression of love and sexuality led researchers to consider the influence of socialization and to recognize cultural variation in many aspects of the 1970s, the emerging women’s movement also contributed to a cultural climate that made the study of what had been traditionally thought of as “women’s concerns” not only acceptable, but in fact necessary for the science of human the same time, social psychologists were beginning work that would show that adult love could be studied experimentally and in the history of psychological research on love would be incomplete without reference to “l’affaire proxmire”. Senator, gave the first of a series of so-called golden fleece awards to ellen berscheid and elaine hatfield, the two most prominent love researchers of the time. For the ensuing years, that ill-informed and ignoble proclamation cast a pall not only on berscheid and hatfield but on any scientist interested in studying love. To this day, politics occasionally obstructs funding for research on e the political barrier to love research in the u. According to some authors, love is defined as a desire to enter, maintain, or expand a close, connected, and ongoing relationship with another erable evidence supports a basic distinction, first offered in 1978, between passionate love (“a state of intense longing for union with another”) and other types of romantic love, labeled companionate love (“the affection we feel for those with whom our lives are deeply entwined”). The evidence for this distinction comes from a variety of research methods, including psychometric techniques (e. Factor analysis, multidimensional scaling, and prototype analysis), examinations of the behavioral and relationship consequences of different forms of romantic love, and biological studies, which are discussed in this work has focused on identifying and measuring passionate love and several aspects of romantic love, which include two components: intimacy and commitment. Some scholars see companionate love as a combination of intimacy and commitment whereas others see intimacy as the central component, with commitment as a peripheral factor (but important in its own right, such as for predicting relationship longevity).
In some studies, trust and caring were considered highly prototypical of love, whereas uncertainty and “butterflies in the stomach” were more nate and companionate love solves different adaptational problems. Passionate love may be said to solve the attraction problem—that is, for individuals to enter into a potentially long-term mating relationship, they must first identify and select suitable candidates, attract the other’s interest, engage in relationship-building behavior, and then go about reorganizing existing activities and relationships so as to include the other. For the most part, these changes are consistent with the idea of disrupting existing activities, routines, and social networks to orient the individual’s attention and goal-directed behavior toward a specific new desire is often substantially linked to passionate love, although existing evidence suggests that they are empirically and functionally distinguishable. For example, romantic attraction and sexuality involve different brain systems, a contention supported de novo by recent functional magnetic resonance imaging erably less effort has been devoted toward understanding the evolutionary significance of the intimacy and commitment aspects of love. However, much evidence indicates that love in long-term relationships is associated with intimacy, trust, caring, and attachment, all factors that contribute to the maintenance of relationships over generally, the term companionate love may be characterized by a communal relationship: a relationship built on mutual expectations that one’s self and a partner will be responsive to each other’s was speculated that companionate love, or at least the various processes associated with it, is responsible for the noted association between social relatedness and health and well-being. In a recent series of papers, it was claimed that marriage is linked to health noted the positive functions of love, it is also important to consider the dark side. That is, problems in love and love relationships are a significant source of suicides, homicides, and both major and minor emotional disorders, such as anxiety and depression. Love matters not only because it can make our lives better, but also because it is a major source of misery and pain that can make life much particularly timely prediction is that psychological theories of love are likely to become more biologically informed, in the sense that the psychological and behavioral phenomena associated with love will have clear, comprehensible, and distinguishable neural and hormonal substrates.
This will be useful not so much for the intrinsic purpose of identifying the brain and body regions in which love occurs, but rather because the identification of neural and hormonal circuits corresponding to particular experiences and behaviors will allow researchers to sort the various phenomena associated with love into their natural example, it will be important to further distinguish passionate love from companionate love on the one hand and from lust (i. This distinction will be important for a key reason: although current evidence strongly suggests that these three forms of love involve different biological systems, different functions, different behaviors, and different consequences, much thinking in both popular culture and in the scientific literature conflates them. It will also be valuable to examine how neural activations of passionate and companionate love evolve in a given relationship over time, corresponding to experiential is also believed that research will address how culture shapes the experience and expression of love. Although both passionate and companionate love appears to be universal, it is apparent that their manifestations may be moderated by culture-specific norms and nate and companionate love have profoundly different implications for marriage around the world, considered essential in some cultures but contra-indicated or rendered largely irrelevant in others. College students in the 1960s, only 24% of women and 65% of men considered love to be the basis of marriage, but in the 1980s this view was endorsed by more than 80% of both women and y, the authors believe that the future will see a better understanding of what may be the quintessential question about love: how this very individualistic feeling is shaped by experiences in interaction with particular other interesting reading:Why love has wings and sex has not: how reminders of love and sex influence creative and analytic thinking (j. This article examines cognitive links between romantic love and creativity and between sexual desire and analytic thought based on construal level theory. It suggests that when in love, people typically focus on a long-term perspective, which should enhance holistic thinking and thereby creative thought, whereas when experiencing sexual encounters, they focus on the present and on concrete details enhancing analytic thinking. Because people automatically activate these processing styles when in love or when they experience sex, subtle or even unconscious reminders of love versus sex should suffice to change processing modes.
Two studies explicitly or subtly reminded participants of situations of love or sex and found support for this n, intimacy, and time: passionate love as a function of change in intimacy (r. Bratslavsky) to build on existing theories about love, the authors propose that passion is a function of change in intimacy (i. This view is able to account for a broad range of evidence, including frequency of sex in long-term relationships, intimate and sexual behavior of extraverts, gender differences in intimate behavior, gain and loss effects of communicated attraction, and patterns of distress in romantic g romantic love with sex: development of the perceptions of love and sex scale (susan s. Hendrick) pilot work and three studies detail the development of the ‘perceptions of love and sex scale,’ a measure of how people view the link between love and sex in their romantic relationships. College students generated descriptive responses to a query about the connections between love and sex in their romantic relationships. The final version of the scale yielded 17 items on four subscales (love is most important, sex demonstrates love, love comes before sex, and sex is declining) with acceptable psychometric properties and expected correlations with measures of other relationship love, or not to love.
