Nsf career proposal

Of diversity and arency and funding opportunities es and ormative y early career development and pecase 22, 2017 nsf career program career program webinar presentation ntly asked questions (faqs) for the faculty early career development (career) program for submission in years 2017 - 2019  (nsf 17-050). Press releases, photos and award ant information for ion: proposers using orators and other affiliations template for more than project personnel will encounter proposal print . Revised version of the nsf proposal & award policies & procedures guide (pappg) (nsf 17-1), ive for proposals submitted, or due, on or after january 30, 2017. Please be advised that, the specified due date, the guidelines contained in nsf 17-1 may apply to proposals submitted in response to proposal deadline wednesday in july, annually thereafter. For bio, cise, thursday in july, annually friday in july, annually : the faculty early career development (career) program is a foundation-wide activity that offers the national science foundation's most prestigious awards in support of early-career faculty who have the potential to serve as academic role models in research and education and to lead advances in the mission of their department or organization. Activities pursued by early-career faculty should build a firm foundation for a lifetime of leadership in integrating education and research. Nsf encourages submission of career proposals from early-career faculty at all career-eligible organizations and especially encourages women, members of underrepresented minority groups, and persons with disabilities to : each year nsf selects nominees for the presidential early career awards for scientists and engineers (pecase) from among the most meritorious recent career awardees. These awards foster innovative developments in science and technology, increase awareness of careers in science and engineering, give recognition to the scientific missions of the participating agencies, enhance connections between fundamental research and national goals, and highlight the importance of science and technology for the nation’s future. At nsf, up to twenty nominees for this award are selected each year from among the pecase-eligible career awardees most likely to become the leaders of academic research and education in the twenty-first century. The white house office of science and technology policy makes the final selection and announcement of the ntly asked questions (faqs) for the faculty early career development (career) program for submission in years 2017 - 2019 (nsf 17-050). Pecase outreach activities -life balance (clb) supplemental funding ch opportunities in europe for nsf career ch opportunities in germany for nsf career has been funded (recent awards made through this program, with abstracts). You want to win a career carolina state nsf early faculty development (career) program award is the most sought-after recognition a new faculty member can receive. As soon as most new assistant professors move into their offices and boot up their computers, they are expected to begin work on their career proposalsand if they dont make it on the first attempt they are expected to keep plugging away until they either win the award or are no longer i recently had the pleasure of serving on an nsf review panel, i noticed that certain common mistakes tended to land proposals in the "sorrygood try, but not quite good enough to get funded" category. If youre a new faculty member planning to go for a career award, you might consider taking several precautions to avoid these ing to the nsf program solicitation, career proposals must include "creative, integrative, and effective research and education plans," and show "excellence in both education and research. It appeared that many of the authors of proposals i reviewed worked long and hard on their research plans, then thought briefly about their education plans and wrote one or two cursory paragraphs about sponsoring undergraduate research projects or developing a new graduate course related to the proposal topic. With very few exceptions, those proposals were not outcome makes sense if you think about it. Most career applicants have spent at least four years thinking about the research topic of their proposals and are also smart enough to get knowledgeable senior colleagues to review their research plans. Those plans are consequently excellent in most proposals that make it past the first cut, which means that the education plans often determine who gets the awards. If the education plans are hastily or unimaginatively written, the proposals are not likely to be are several more specific the program solicitation carefully and follow all instructions. When it tells you that you must obtain the written endorsement of your department head and your bio must contain no more than 10 references and your project description has a 15-page maximum and you may submit letters of support from prospective collaborators but not reference letters, believe you have outlined your plans, run your ideas by the career contact person in the nsf division or program to which you plan to submit.

You will find them extremely helpfulthey dont want you to waste your time, reviewers time, and ultimately their time by writing a proposal that doesnt fit their programs goals and guidelines. They might recommend modifications that would make your proposal more suitable for them, or they might suggest sending the proposal to another program for which it would be a better a thorough literature review and make sure you cite the most important theoretical and experimental work and most important researchers in the areas covered by the proposal. Ignoring important research in your proposal reflects poorly on your expertise and looks like you havent done your homework, and omitting an important researcher will also do very little for your cause, especially if he or she turns out to be a reviewer. Youd be surprised at how often those important people will get to review your proposals and how surly they can become if they dont see their names in the reference list or their work is attention to assessment, especially in the education plan. If you submit a proposal for a five-year $300,000 study and propose to do research that would clearly require a large team of investigators and a much higher level of funding, it will probably not be funded, especially if youre also going to be teaching three courses a semester throughout the award period. Youre much better off proposing something of more limited scope that you have a reasonable chance of forget that youre writing a career development plan and not just a research proposal. Since you cant include reference letters in the proposal, the only one in a position to blow your horn is youand you can be sure that your competitors will be blowing internal feedback before submitting the proposal. Beg, bribe, do whatever it takes to get knowledgeable colleagues to act like picky nsf reviewers and bleed red ink all over your proposal draft. 1 revise the proposal to take into account the criticisms and suggestions you get, and then send it all these things may not make your proposal a guaranteed winner, but it will unquestionably improve your odds. Good y early career development es the description of nsf presidential early career awards for scientists and engineers (pecase). Document(s):National science orate for biological orate for computer & information science & orate for education & human orate for orate for orate for mathematical & physical orate for social, behavioral & economic of integrative of international science and proposal deadline(s) (due by 5 p. Submitter's local time):Third wednesday in july, annually thursday in july, annually friday in july, annually ant information and revision ility requirements have been revised to clarify the required early-career status of t for senior personnel other than the pi that is commensurate with a limited collaborative role in the project is now allowed in the budget of the proposal or of a proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should be submitted in accordance with the revised nsf proposal & award policies & procedures guide (pappg) (nsf 17-1), which is effective for proposals submitted, or due, on or after january 30, y of program y early career development program (career). The description of the nsf component of the presidential early career awards for scientists and engineers (pecase). The faculty early career development (career) program is a foundation-wide activity that offers the national science foundation's most prestigious awards in support of early-career faculty who have the potential to serve as academic role models in research and education and to lead advances in the mission of their department or organization. Type of award:Standard grant or continuing ted number of awards:Anticipated funding amount:This annual amount is approximate, includes new and continuing increments, and is subject to availability of ility may submit proposals:Proposals may only be submitted by the following:Universities and colleges - universities and two- and four-year colleges (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in, the us acting on behalf of their faculty members. Are withdrawn before review or are returned without review) do not count toward the three-competition on number of proposals per organization:There are no restrictions or on number of proposals per pi or co-pi:An eligible principal investigator may submit only one career proposal per annual al preparation and submission instructions. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further proposal deadline(s) (due by 5 p. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further ing requirements:Standard nsf reporting requirements y of program ility al preparation and submission al preparation ary ne/ proposal processing and review review principles and and selection administration cation of the ing program is a foundation-wide activity that offers the national science foundation's most prestigious awards for faculty members beginning their independent careers. The intent of the program is to provide stable support at a sufficient level and duration to enable awardees to develop careers not only as outstanding researchers but also as educators demonstrating commitment to teaching, learning, and dissemination of knowledge. Nsf encourages submission of career proposals from eligible early-career faculty at all career-eligible organizations, especially women, members of underrepresented minority groups, and persons with .

Program premier program emphasizes the importance the foundation places on the early development of academic careers dedicated to stimulating the discovery process in which the excitement of research is enhanced by inspired teaching, enthusiastic learning, and disseminating new knowledge. Effective integration of research and education generates a synergy in which the process of discovery stimulates learning, and assures that the findings and methods of research and education are quickly and effectively communicated in a broader context and to a large career program embodies nsf’s commitment to encourage faculty and academic institutions to value and support the integration of research and education. Presidential early career award for scientists and engineers (pecase) is the highest honor bestowed by the united states government on outstanding scientists and engineers beginning their independent research careers. At nsf, up to twenty nominees for this award are selected each year from among recent career awardees deemed most likely to become the leaders of academic research and education for the twenty-first century. Award career award, including indirect costs, is expected to total a minimum of $400,000 for the 5-year duration, with the following exceptions: awards for proposals to the directorate for biological sciences (bio), the directorate for engineering (eng), or the office of polar programs (opp) are expected to total a minimum of $500,000 for the 5-year duration. Career awards are eligible for supplemental funding as described in the nsf proposal & award policies & procedures guide (pappg). Eligibility may submit proposals:Proposals may only be submitted by the following:Universities and colleges - universities and two- and four-year colleges (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in, the us acting on behalf of their faculty members. Are withdrawn before review or are returned without review) do not count toward the three-competition on number of proposals per organization:There are no restrictions or on number of proposals per pi or co-pi:An eligible principal investigator may submit only one career proposal per annual onal eligibility info:Proposers must meet all of the following eligibility requirements:Hold a doctoral degree in a field supported by nsf by the cognizant directorate's deadline for submission of career proposals;. Employed in a tenure-track (or tenure-track-equivalent) position as an assistant professor (or equivalent title) as of october 1 after the proposal submission;. Track equivalency - for a position to be considered a tenure-track-equivalent position, it must meet all of the following requirements: (1) the employee has a continuing appointment that is expected to last the five years of a career grant; (2) the appointment has substantial research and educational responsibilities; and (3) the proposed project relates to the employee's career goals and job responsibilities as well as to the mission of the department or organization. As stated in the proposal preparation instructions, for non-tenure-track faculty, the departmental letter must affirm that the investigator's appointment is at an early-career level equivalent to pre-tenure status, and the departmental letter must clearly and convincingly demonstrate how the faculty member's appointment satisfies all the above requirements of tenure-track y members who are associate professors or in equivalent appointments, with or without tenure, are not eligible for the career program. Faculty members who hold adjunct faculty or equivalent appointments are not eligible for the career exemptions from these eligibility criteria will be eligibility requires that the applicant be a u. Although persons who have received pecase awards through other agencies may be eligible for career, they are not eligible to be nominated by nsf for another pecase award. Proposal preparation proposal preparation instructions: proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this program solicitation via or via the nsf fastlane pappg chapter ii. Please note that the proposal preparation instructions provided in this program solicitation may deviate from the pappg following instructions supplement the guidelines in the nsf proposal & award policies & procedures guide (pappg) and nsf application guide for the specified m solicitation number. Fastlane users: select the career program solicitation number shown at the beginning of this solicitation from the drop-down menu. Select at least one specific disciplinary program from the drop-down list in fastlane as the nsf program(s) to consider the proposal. No co-pis are permitted on the cover project description section should contain a well-argued and specific proposal for activities that will, over a 5-year period, build a firm foundation for a lifetime of contributions to research and education in the context of the principal investigator's organization. The proposed project should aim to advance the employee's career goals and job responsibilities as well as the mission of the department or organization. The proposed activities should help applicants develop in their careers as both outstanding researchers and educators.

The research and educational activities do not need to be addressed separately if the relationship between the two is such that the presentation of the integrated project is better served by interspersing the two throughout the project ion activities – the education component of the proposal may be in a broad range of areas and may be directed to any level: k-12 students, undergraduates, graduate students, and/or the general public, but should be related to the proposed research and consistent with the career goals of the pi. We invite proposals from early-career investigators who wish to pursue research and education activities that cross disciplinary boundaries. Increasingly, career proposals are co-reviewed by more than one program within a division or a directorate, or across directorates/offices. Investigators have the option of including the associated costs in the budget line items of the proposal, or in subawards to another institution for all necessary research and educational activities (for example, hiring an external evaluator, or securing time at a shared research facility). Because the career program is designed to foster individual career development, partners or collaborators may not be listed as co-principal investigators on the cover page. If critical for a given project, support for collaborators may be requested in the senior personnel or consultant services budget line items of the proposal, or in subawards to another institution. However, while recognizing that projects may entail cross-disciplinary collaborations, it is expected that the primary support for a career award will be for the pi and his/her research efforts, with support for other senior personnel commensurate with their limited role in the project. Ensuring that the career program continues to focus on fostering individual career development of early-career scientists and engineers will be an integral part of the merit review of career -sector perspectives – nsf recognizes that individual investigators may have disciplinary and career interests that enhance their research and education plans through an additional activity such as entrepreneurship, industry partnerships, or policy. We invite proposals from early-career investigators who wish to enhance their research and education activities along these lines. If critical for a given project, investigators have the option of including the associated costs in the budget line items of the proposal or in subawards to another ific software development – proposed research activities may involve development of innovative scientific software, along with related studies of reproducibility, provenance, usability, security, adoption, and sustainability of the software, as well as its adaptability to emerging technologies and requirements. If software artifacts are anticipated in a given project, investigators should state and justify which software license(s) will be used for the released e references in support of both research and education aspects of the career phical sketch of principal investigator:The biographical sketch should be prepared following the instructions in the latest nsf proposal & award policies & procedures guide (pappg) and should include both research and education activities and onal supplementary documentation for career proposals:Scan the signed original(s) of the following document(s) and upload the scans as a pdf file into the supplementary documents section of the proposal. Departmental letter (a proposal submitted without this letter will be returned without review) – nsf encourages organizations to value and reward the integration of research and education and the effective mentoring of its early-career faculty in their department. This integration of research and education requires close collaboration between the career principal investigator (pi) and his/her organization throughout the duration of the award. To demonstrate the department’s support of the career development plan of the pi, the proposal must include one (and only one) letter from the pi's department head (or equivalent organizational official). The letter, which will be included as part of the consideration of the overall merits of the proposal, should demonstrate an understanding of, and a commitment to, the effective integration of research and education as a primary objective of the career departmental letter should be no more than 2 pages in length and include the department head's name and title below the signature. The letter should contain the following elements:A statement to the effect that the pi is eligible for the career program. For non-tenure-track faculty, the departmental letter must affirm that the investigator's appointment is at an early-career level equivalent to pre-tenure status, pursuant to the eligibility criteria specified above. Further, for non-tenure-track faculty, the departmental letter must clearly and convincingly demonstrate how the faculty member satisfies all the requirements of tenure-track equivalency as defined in the eligibility criteria specified in this indication that the pi's proposed career research and education activities are supported by and advance the educational and research goals of the department and the organization, and that the department is committed to the support and professional development of the pi; and. Description of a) the relationship between the career project, the pi's career goals and job responsibilities, and the mission of his/her department/organization, and b) the ways in which the department head (or equivalent) will ensure the appropriate mentoring of the pi, in the context of the pi's career development and his/her efforts to integrate research and education throughout the period of the award and beyond. Insert the full name of the principal investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by the nsf, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the project description or the facilities, equipment or other resources section of the proposal.

Requests for letters of collaboration should be made by the pi well in advance of the proposal submission deadline, because they must be included at the time of submission. Please note that letters of recommendation for the pi or other letters of support for the project are not appendices are al compliance with program solicitation requirements:All career proposals will be checked for compliance with this career program solicitation and the latest nsf proposal & award policies & procedures guide (pappg). Sure to use this career program solicitation number in the cover sheet in order to have the proposal reviewed according to the current guidelines associated with the career ants must include the proposal classification form for all submissions to bio; fastlane will not allow processing of the proposal without addition, proposals that are non-compliant with the career solicitation for the following reasons will be returned without review:Co-principal investigator(s) listed on the cover mental letter is missing (be sure to put the letter in the supplementary documents section, not the single copy documents section). Addition, according to the nsf proposal & award policies & procedures guide (pappg), any proposal submitted to a program solicitation with a fixed proposal deadline must be submitted by that deadline date up to 5 p. Program officers will be instructed to return without review any career proposal that arrives after the deadline for the appropriate directorate/office, unless there was a technical problem with the proposal submission (through either fastlane or ) and the technical problem is supported by documentation from fastlane or at the time of submission and prior to the deadline. A possible slowdown of fastlane or due to volume is not a valid reason for an extension and pis are strongly encouraged to submit their career proposals in advance of the deadline to allow time to correct any problems that may occur in the submission m officers will also return without review any proposal that is non-compliant with the pappg because:The proposed work duplicates, or is substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by nsf from the same proposal was previously declined and was not revised to take into account the major comments from the prior nsf above list is not an all-inclusive list of reasons that proposals are returned without review. For complete information on pappg proposal compliance refer to the full text of the pappg. Also consult the proposal preparation checklist of the soon as the proposal is submitted via fastlane or by your research office, make sure to print a final copy of the submitted version for your records. It is your responsibility, and that of your sponsored projects office, to ascertain that all of the proposal contents are there and that the proposal is compliant with the pappg and the career solicitation. If mistakes or missing information/documentation are found prior to the appropriate career deadline, you can submit a proposal file update that would be automatically accepted. Note that according to the pappg, file updates will not be allowed after the deadline, except to correct a technical problem with the proposal (i. If your career deadline has passed and you discover a formatting or print problem, contact your disciplinary program officer to discuss whether nsf will approve a proposal file update. You should thoroughly review your submitted proposal document in order to identify any pdf conversion or printing problems, leaving enough time to correct any problems prior to the deadline. Budgetary ion of voluntary committed cost sharing is budgetary limitations:Co-pis are not allowed in career proposals. In particular, while recognizing that projects may entail cross-disciplinary collaborations, it is expected that the primary support for a career award will be for the pi and his/her research efforts. In some cases, it may be appropriate to include academic year salary support for the pi on a career budget (for example, pis who have heavy teaching responsibilities or who must conduct field work during the academic year). Proposers should talk to the cognizant program officers about their individual preparation instructions:A budget justification (maximum of three pages) must be included as part of the career proposal deadline(s) (due by 5 p. Fastlane/ proposals submitted via fastlane:To prepare and submit a proposal via fastlane, see detailed technical instructions available at: https:///a1/. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the nsf program staff contact(s) listed in section viii of this funding proposals submitted via :Before using for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the nsf program staff contact(s) listed in section viii of this ting the proposal: once all documents have been completed, the authorized organizational representative (aor) must submit the application to and verify the desired funding opportunity and agency to which the application is submitted.

Nsf proposal processing and review als received by nsf are assigned to the appropriate nsf program for acknowledgement and, if they meet nsf requirements, for review. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an nsf program officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside nsf either as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. Proposers are invited to suggest names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the proposal. In addition, program officers may obtain comments from site visits before recommending final action on proposals. A flowchart that depicts the entire nsf proposal and award process (and associated timeline) is included in pappg exhibit ers should also be aware of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of nsf's mission, as articulated in investing in science, engineering, and education for the nation's future: nsf strategic plan for 2014-2018. These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. Merit review principles are to be given due diligence by pis and organizations when preparing proposals and managing projects, by reviewers when reading and evaluating proposals, and by nsf program staff when determining whether or not to recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Merit review nsf proposals are evaluated through use of the two national science board approved merit review criteria. Contains additional information for use by proposers in development of the project description section of the proposal). I), prior to the review of a evaluating nsf proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. These issues apply both to the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all proposals against two criteria:Intellectual merit: the intellectual merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; r impacts: the broader impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal following elements should be considered in the review for both criteria:What is the potential for the proposed activity e knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (intellectual merit); t society or advance desired societal outcomes (broader impacts)? Review and selection als submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed hoc review and/or panel ers will be asked to evaluate proposals using two national science board approved merit review criteria and, if applicable, additional program specific criteria. The program officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the nsf program officer recommends to the cognizant division director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. Nsf strives to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. Large or particularly complex proposals or proposals from new awardees may require additional review and processing time. The interval ends when the division director acts upon the program officer's programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the division of grants and agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications. A principal investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the nsf grants and agreements officer does so at their own an award or declination decision has been made, principal investigators are provided feedback about their proposals. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant nsf program administering the program.

Nsf award consists of: (1) the award notice, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which nsf has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as grant general conditions (gc-1)*; or research terms and conditions* and (5) any announcement or other nsf issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award notice. Nsf awards are electronically signed by an nsf grants and agreements officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via l award conditions:If the principal investigator (pi) transfers at any time prior to or during the award period to a position that is tenured, tenure-track, or tenure-track-equivalent at a career-eligible institution, the career award may be transferred to the new institution. The new departmental letter must document support for the project goals as described in the original proposal or in a revised scope, as well as provide a plan for the mentoring of the pi. Note that if a career award has received co-funding from the experimental program to stimulate competitive research (epscor), no portion of the epscor funds may be transferred to a non-epscor career award must be relinquished if the pi transfers at any time prior to or during the award period:To a position that is not either tenured, tenure-track, or tenure-track-equivalent; a new organization that is not most circumstances, transfer of the career award to a substitute pi is not permissible. However, the cognizant program officer may approve a no-cost extension period to allow students or postdoctoral researchers to finish their other situations where a pi is unable to continue work, continued support of the graduate and postdoctoral students supported under the career project may be possible. No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the pi also is required to submit a final project report, and a project outcomes report for the general e to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay nsf review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for all identified pis and co-pis on a given award. In addition, "nsf update" is an information-delivery system designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of new nsf funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming nsf grants conferences. The foundation accounts for about one-fourth of federal support to academic institutions for basic receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. Nsf information center):Tdd (for the hearing-impaired):To order publications or forms:To locate nsf employees:Privacy act and public burden information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the national science foundation act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the executive branch and to congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding applicants or nominees as part of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another federal agency, court, or party in a court or federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. See systems of records, nsf-50, "principal investigator/proposal file and associated records," 69 federal register 26410 (may 12, 2004), and nsf-51, "reviewer/proposal file and associated records," 69 federal register 26410 (may 12, 2004). Of diversity and arency and ntly asked questions (faqs) for the faculty early career development (career) program for submission in years 2017 - als must be submitted via fastlane or by 5:00 p. Submitter's local time, to the applicable deadline date below:The following set of questions and answers refer to frequently asked questions (faqs) about the career program solicitation. If there are any inconsistencies between the career program solicitation and these faqs, the information in the program solicitation document is organized as follows:Whom should i contact to discuss my ideas for a career proposal to be sure nsf supports the topic area? Career program solicitation states that a proposer must have the title of assistant professor or equivalent. Happens if my appointment changes from assistant professor to associate professor (either tenure-track or tenured) after i submit my career proposal? Career program solicitation requires that i hold a doctoral degree by the proposal submission deadline. I can participate in at most three career competitions, when is the best time to apply? I submit a career proposal and a regular research proposal on a similar topic to nsf at the same time?

I submit a career proposal and another proposal on a different topic to nsf in the same year? What should i do to indicate which program(s) i want to consider my proposal? I submit a proposal to just career or to a particular program at nsf and how do i decide to which program i should submit my career proposal? Announcement of career will i be notified of the final decision on my career proposal? Happens to my career award if i leave my academic appointment for a position that is tenured, tenure-track, or tenure-track-equivalent at a career-eligible institution? Happens to my career award if i leave my academic appointment for a position that is neither tenured, tenure-track, nor tenure-track-equivalent; or for a position at a new organization that is not career-eligible? Should i contact to discuss my ideas for a career proposal to be sure nsf supports the topic area? An associate professor (with or without tenure) is not eligible to apply for a career happens if my appointment changes from assistant professor to associate professor (either tenure-track or tenured) before october 1 after i submit my career proposal? Should not submit a career proposal if you anticipate that your title will change to associate professor on or before the october 1st following the proposal submission career program solicitation requires that i hold a doctoral degree by the proposal submission deadline. You are not eligible unless you receive the official, dated diploma, by the proposal deadline. Career eligibility is not limited by time from degree or years in a tenure track appointment. But you must have a tenure-track or tenure-track-equivalent appointment, substantial research and educational responsibilities as part of your employment, and meet all other career eligibility requirements. You must choose between submitting a proposal to the rui or to the career program solicitation. You may not include the additional certificate of rui eligibility or the rui impact statement on a career i have received funds from the federal government to perform research, may i still apply for a career award? What you propose to do as part of your career proposal should not overlap what you have been funded to do by nsf or any other agency. You may not submit a career proposal if you already have received a career i can participate in at most three career competitions, when is the best time to apply? Most important consideration is whether you are ready to write a proposal with an innovative research idea, and an education plan, aligned with the mission of your department or organization. You might discuss your readiness and your career development to date with your department chair or an nsf program officer. Following are common reasons why proposals are found to be non-compliant with the career solicitation:A co-principal investigator is listed on the cover mental letter is submitted career proposals should follow the guidelines in the career program solicitation and the nsf pappg. You may submit only one career proposal per i submit a career proposal and a regular research proposal on a similar topic to nsf at the same time?

The submission of duplicate or substantially similar proposals concurrently for review by more than one program without prior nsf approval will result in the return of the redundant proposals. You are planning to submit a career proposal and another proposal to the same nsf program, please contact the disciplinary program officer to discuss your individual i submit a career proposal and another proposal on a different topic to nsf in the same year? Nsf may return without review a second proposal on a closely related research are the expectations for the level of activities in the education component? What is expected is a well-argued and specific proposal for activities over a 5-year period that will build a firm foundation for a lifetime of integrated contributions to research and education. Details of any proposed collaborations should be described in the project description and the facilities, equipment, and other resources sections of the proposal. Note that individuals cannot apply for a presidential early career award for scientists and engineers (pecase). At nsf, up to 20 nominees for this award are selected each year from among recent career awardees deemed most likely to become the leaders of academic research and education for the twenty-first century. The white house office of science and technology policy (ostp) makes the final selection and announcement of the addition to meeting the career eligibility requirements, pecase nominees must be u. If you have received more than one prior award (excluding amendments), you need only report on the award that is most closely related to the career proposal. Career budget request should reflect the scope of the research and education plans, and the practices within your discipline. The minimum career award size is expected to be $400,000, including indirect cost or overhead, for a 5- year period, except in the directorate for biological sciences (bio), the directorate for engineering (eng), and the office of polar programs (plr). Career awards in bio, eng, or plr are expected to be a minimum of $500,000 (approximately $100,000 per year) for the 5-year duration. There is no maximum award size, but be realistic about your budget expectations and what has been funded before by the program considering your proposal. Some directorates/divisions/programs usually fund career awards closer to the minimum, while some others have a higher average award size. Before preparing the budget for your career proposal, you are strongly encouraged to contact your disciplinary program officer or your division career contact to discuss your planned i request academic year salary on a career proposal? Pi who has heavy teaching responsibilities or whose proposed activities may involve a limited period of fieldwork or other extraordinary career-development activity in research or education may be justified in requesting academic year salary support on their budgets. Before including any academic year salary support on your career budget you should contact your disciplinary program officer to discuss your individual i request funds to support the education component of my career proposal? If resources are required, either the proposal budget or the project description should indicate how this aspect of the program would be funded. Nsf program officers are not authorized to grant extensions of the career proposal seems to fit in two different programs. May designate more than one disciplinary program in the cover sheet if you think two or more programs should jointly review your proposal.

It is very important that you select the most relevant program as the primary organization because that is the organization that is most likely to have primary responsibility for reviewing your proposal. Your proposal must be submitted by the career deadline of the primary directorate/office that you selected in the cover encourages multidisciplinary proposals. You are strongly encouraged to contact the program officer most closely related to the subject matter when preparing a cross-disciplinary proposal. Are strongly encouraged to submit their career proposals well in advance of the deadline to allow time to correct any problems that may occur in the submission process. If fastlane or is unable to resolve the submission problem and you cannot submit your proposal by the deadline, please make sure to get documentation that you contacted the support center before your deadline. If you see a problem before the deadline, you may use the fastlane proposal file update module to replace files or revise other proposal attributes of a submitted proposal. A request for a proposal file update will be automatically accepted only if submitted prior to your career deadline. On rare occasions, a proposal has technical problems due to pdf conversion or printing problems. If your deadline has passed and you discover this problem, contact your disciplinary program officer to discuss whether nsf will approve a proposal file update. You should thoroughly review your proposal before it is submitted, including identifying any pdf conversion or printing problems. You are encouraged to download the submitted version of your proposal from the fastlane site to ascertain that that version contains all the proposal parts and that it is i submit a proposal to just the career program solicitation or to a particular program at nsf and how do i decide to which program i should submit my career proposal? During the proposal submission process, you must select at least one specific nsf disciplinary program most related to the proposed , you should determine whether the proposed research project falls within the realm of research that nsf normally supports. The nsf guide to programs and directorate and division web pages provide descriptions of the topic areas supported by nsf disciplinary nsf determines that your proposal is more appropriate for a different program than the primary one you selected, the proposal will be reassigned to the appropriate organizational unit. Nsf will make the final determination of where your proposal will be assigned and considered. If you have not received notification of a decision on your proposal within six months of its submission and your proposal status is shown as "pending" in fastlane, you can contact the program or division to which your proposal was assigned to inquire about the status of your proposal. Addition to meeting all of the requirements for annual and final reports that apply to other nsf awards, the reports for career awards must summarize progress in both research and educational activities and indicate how well these activities are being integrated and assessed. Collaborative and international activities should also be types of supplemental funds are available for career awards? Contact your disciplinary program officer to ask about possible supplemental funding opportunities for career happens to my career award if i leave my academic appointment for a position that is tenured, tenure-track, or tenure-track-equivalent at a career-eligible institution? The principal investigator transfers at any time prior to or during the award period to a position that is tenured, tenure-track, or tenure-track-equivalent at a career-eligible institution, the career award may be transferred to the new institution. The new departmental letter must document support for the project goals as described in the original proposal or in a revised scope, as well as provide a plan for the mentoring of the a career award has epscor co-funding, no portion of the epscor funds may be transferred to a non-epscor happens to my career award if i leave my academic appointment for a position that is neither tenured, tenure-track, nor tenure-track-equivalent; or for a position at a new organization that is not career-eligible?

In these circumstances, transfer of the career award to a substitute pi is not permissible. Contact the disciplinary program officer as soon you know you will be leaving to inquire about this happens to my career award if i am unable to continue the project? The pi is unable to continue work, long-term continued support of the graduate and postdoctoral students supported under the career project may be possible.