Presenting research results
Offers products & services to support you:Ethics and data security | top research websites | choosing your method presenting your findings | becoming a research-engaged ting your findings? A suggested report structure is available who wants to know about your research in detail; for example, other researchers, academics or tioner, learner or school community audiences who may not have the time to read a lengthy ising the key findings. A summary will also briefly discuss aims, methods and provide a very brief tioners, researchers and other interested parties. Offering targeted ing a detailed overview of all the research g out the key messages from the research and verbally presenting these to an audience face to face or via a y sharing your key findings with a small or large audience. This can be done through a formal conference or during a staff meeting or school tations can work for all settings, ages and g findings via twitter, blogs or you tube, for y sharing your key message(s) with a large without access to the are endless ways of presenting your research findings – be as innovative as you like! Are the core components of a research report:Title: this should give the reader an idea of what the research is uction: this should explain what the research is about (outlining the aims and purpose) and present your research question(s).
Presenting research findings
Review (optional): you may want to discuss what is already known about your topic area and where your research fits into that wider picture (i. This should outline how your research was conducted, which methods you used and the types and numbers of people that were involved (ensuring their anonymity). It is often split into thematic sub-sections based on your research question(s) and data. You used quantitative methods you could include:charts, graphs or tables and need to show how your findings answer your research questions and what implications your findings have for others (e. You may also want to provide a summary of key messages at the start of each sub-section, this will help the reader decide if they want to read that section or sion: this section, which is usually quite brief, should summarise the key messages and offer a conclusion to the research endations (optional): it is often useful to outline any recommendations emerging from your research. These must be based on your research further detail you can consult our how to guides or our range of books to help you do your own research.
Nfer also offer training days in your school on research methods, which includes presenting your to methods of t our helpline helpline will be closed from 5. On 2nd : products@sion of you interested in doing your own research to improve your results? Research mark enquring schools surveys workshops/training rs and ch news direct note that by providing this information, you confirm that you are happy for nfer to hold your details and send you updates by offers products & services to support you:Ethics and data security | top research websites | choosing your method presenting your findings | becoming a research-engaged ting your findings? Research mark enquring schools surveys workshops/training rs and ch news direct note that by providing this information, you confirm that you are happy for nfer to hold your details and send you updates by email. Tips on how to present research hed: september 30, post was originally submitted to the national council for voluntary organisations blog here in september 2010. Network i participate in was recently asked the question:had anyone on the list has gone from academia into policy research of any kind and has given presentations based on academic research to think tanks, government departments, ngos or similar and had any useful insights?
It’s great in a q&a when a presenter responds to a question and begins with the name of the person who your presentation to that audience – surprisingly, many don’t do this and just present ‘their research’ and expect people to want to think through why it is there is a policy or practice context, highlight this – more so than theoretical/methodological context (though you should briefly allude to these to highlight you know your onions). There are policy or practice recommendations, you must draw these out – at the end of the day, people in these organisations are using research-based evidence as a means to making decisions – so help them make those e recommendations that are actionable and that help your audience. Don’t just have recommendations that say 1) we need to do more research and 2) my research has highlighted that this issue needs more funds. From my experience, people don’t want to be told that different methods produce different results, that the evidence is inconclusive – ie all the richness that researchers care about. Safety at home”: experiences from testing of video communication between patients and home health care personneleffects of experiencing visual illusions and susceptibility to biases in one’s social judgmentsexploring the lived experiences of mothers of children with intellectual disability in ghanagender roles and employment pathways of older women and men in sciences ght © 2016 sage of use | site d law school librarylangdell hall1545 massachusetts avenuecambridge, ma02138phone: 617-495-3455find us on the mapcontact r explaining the distribution of a single variable or reviewing the results of an advanced statistical analysis, the researcher should try to convey substantive information in a clear and concise manner. Lee epstein, andrew martin, mathew schneider, and christina boyd co-authored an insightful series on best practices in statistical presentation for empirical legal research.
These papers are highly recommended for beginners interested in employing quantitative methods in their research. Some key rules derived from the papers include:When discussing the results of a regression analysis, do not only focus on the parameters which are “statistically significant”. The researcher should also convey how “substantive” an effect each significant variable has on the outcome (dependent) variable. You are attempting to use your results to infer about a population, then you should do so while explicitly discussing the level of uncertainty of your estimates. To avoid presentation of data and results using tables—graphs are almost always n et al. 2006) “on the effective communication of results of empirical studies, part i” vanderbilt law review 59(6): n et al.
2007) “on the effective communication of results of empirical studies, part ii” vanderbilt law review vol. 60(3): d law school librarylangdell hall1545 massachusetts avenuecambridge, ma02138phone: 617-495-3455find us on the mapcontact r explaining the distribution of a single variable or reviewing the results of an advanced statistical analysis, the researcher should try to convey substantive information in a clear and concise manner.