Nsf intellectual merit
Review grfp applications are evaluated using nsf’s two merit review criteria: intellectual merit and broader impacts. In order to present a competitive application, you must address both merit review criteria thoroughly. Remember to ask your reference writers to discuss how you fulfill the merit review criteria as following information is from the 2018 nsf graduate research fellowship program solicitation, section vi:Applications will be reviewed online by virtual panels of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scientists and engineers and other professional graduate education experts. Applicants who select “other” must choose a primary field of study on the list for placement in a review application will be reviewed independently in accordance with the nsf merit review criteria using all available information in the completed application. In considering applications, reviewers are instructed to address the two merit review criteria as approved by the national science board - intellectual merit and broader impacts (nsf proposal and award policies and procedures guide).
What is intellectual merit
Therefore, applicants must include separate statements on intellectual merit and broader impacts in their written statements in order to provide reviewers with the information necessary to evaluate the application with respect to both criteria as detailed intellectual merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance example, panelists evaluating applications submitted to the graduate research fellowship program may consider the following with respect to the intellectual merit criterion: the potential of the applicant to advance knowledge based on a holistic analysis of the complete application, including the personal, relevant background, and future goals statement, graduate research plan statement, strength of the academic record, description of previous research experience or publication/presentations, and broader impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal sts may consider the following with respect to the broader impacts criterion: the potential of the applicant for future broader impacts as indicated by personal experiences, professional experiences, educational experiences and future following elements should be considered in the review for both criteria:What is the potential for the proposed activity to:Advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (intellectual merit); t society or advance desired societal outcomes (broader impacts)? Merit review principles and national science foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates new knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across all areas of science and engineering research and education. To identify which projects to support, nsf relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects of a proposed project and its potential to contribute more broadly to advancing nsfs mission to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes. Nsf makes every effort to conduct a fair, competitive, transparent merit review process for the selection of projects. Merit review principles are to be given due diligence by pis and organizations when preparing proposals and managing projects, by reviewers when reading and evaluating proposals, and by nsf program staff when determining whether or not to recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards.
Thus, individual projects should include clearly stated goals, specific descriptions of the activities that the pi intends to do, and a plan in place to document the outputs of those three merit review principles provide the basis for the merit review criteria, as well as a context within which the users of the criteria can better understand their intent. Merit review nsf proposals are evaluated through use of two national science board approved merit review criteria. In some instances, however, nsf will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and two merit review criteria are listed below. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all proposals against two criteria:Intellectual merit: the intellectual merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; r impacts: the broader impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal following elements should be considered in the review for both criteria:1. Advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (intellectual merit); and.
Optimally, reviewers should have:Special knowledge of the science and engineering subfields involved in the proposals to be reviewed to evaluate competence, intellectual merit, and utility of the proposed activity. Without assuming any liability for inadvertent disclosure, nsf will seek to limit disclosure of such information to its employees and to outside reviewers when necessary for merit review of the proposal, or as otherwise authorized by ns of proposals resulting in grants that contain descriptions of inventions in which either the government or the grantee owns a right, title, or interest (including a non-exclusive license) will not normally be made available to the public until a reasonable time has been allowed for filing patent applications. The national science ectual merit and broader ing to the 2016--2019 grfp solicitation: "when evaluating nsf proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all proposals against two criteria:Intellectual merit:the intellectual merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; r impacts:the broader impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes. Advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (intellectual merit); t society or advance desired societal outcomes (broader impacts)?
Merit criterion: the potential of the applicant to advance knowledge based on a holistic analysis of the complete application, including the personal, relevant background, and future goals statement, graduate research plan statement, strength of the academic record, description of previous research experience or publication/presentations, and references. Must include separate statements on intellectual merit and broader impacts in their written statements in order to provide reviewers with the information necessary to evaluate the application with respect to both criteria... Is recommended that applicants including heading for intellectual merit and broader impacts in their statements. Nsf provides im/bi details on their merit review and merit review criteria resources network in group: nsf graduate research grfp 2017 forthcoming. Nsf provides im/bi details on their merit review and merit review criteria resources network in group: nsf graduate research grfp 2017 g the award has given me time to focus heavily on research and to create a good roadmap for my dissertation topic and methods.
