Why college athletes should not be paid essay

On student athletes should not be t athletes should not be the world of college athletics there are endless topics discussed daily and most pertain to money. An issue that falls under this category includes the heated debate involving whether or not student athletes should receive money. Many people say student athletes should receive compensation according to their specific needs because they spend so much time earning their scholarship and have no time to work. On the other hand, the stronger argument is student athletes should not be able to acquire additional funds in order to help aid them through college. Signing a letter of intent shows s towards paying athletes are being taken and according to the tcu daily skiff, “there’s a legislation being passed around in the big 12 states to provide athletes with an extra stipend in addition to their all-expenses paid education. The idea is that these students are producing truckloads of revenue for the university and should see some of the fruits of their labor. 2) because athletes aren’t paid for producing such money, supporters feel some of the money made should go towards helping with extra expenses. Some students in college receive academic full ride scholarships, which are the same as athletic full rides, but they have time to earn extra money on the side. If these students are receiving a full ride scholarship and have the opportunity to work then an athlete should be paid a compensation for his or her efforts on the playing the contrary, there is a reason the ncaa has not passed a law saying athletes should be paid and numerous reasons support this view. In fact “according to ncaa rules, section 2, title v reads, ‘it is a violation of the ncaa rules for athletes to accept money or gifts while intending to remain eligible. Athletes should to be paid student athletes also get more advantages than other students, such as tuition when needed and special services. Many people also say that paying players could cause many problems, many including discrimination among the players and smaller sports having to be cancelled due to the little amount of money they bring into the t-athletes have a very difficult social life because…. Yet not one penny goes toward paying the people who make the sports possible: the student athletes. It is only reasonable that student athletes have a share in the millions of dollars that their sports businesses bring in. The universities, coaches, and sports companies are getting rich off these athletes and it is time for a change. The first and easiest argument that people use to fight against payment for college athletes is saying that college athletes get pay because they get a free education. Analyzing this statement we can say that free tuitions education is not everything that college athlete’s needs. Although college athletics do bring money to the school and even in to the community, the players should not be paid at all.

The only thing that should be paid for them is their education, books, and every single school athletic programs make money at all. Athletes should not be paid the college athlete gets paid nothing to play the game that he or she loves. When students play a sport in college, they become a part of the national college athletic association, better known as the ncaa. Paying athletes could directly take a toll on the money of the university and create a great debate on who gets paid, and how much. Colleges can only collect a certain amount of money and paying athletes would severely deplete this money, especially for those who need it most. On whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. For example, martinez uses the "amateurism" argument from the ncaa to help explain why college officials would not allow college athletes to be paid, and to further support his argument as to why they should be ez also uses opponent's views to help support his. Opponents of the play for play idea say that college-athletes should not be paid because through scholarships, they are already being paid" (martinez). Words | 14 sities and colleges need to keep a closer eye on student athletes to limit their association with agents and athletic boosters. If they can accomplish this, the integrity of college football may e athletes should be paid for their performance due to the fact that they have other financial responsibilities to take care of as an adult. Athletes should be paid t paying student-athletes say that they should not be paid because through scholarships, they're already being paid. Moreover, unlike ordinary students without athletics, student-athletes must also many times care for families and spouses. About essay on student athletes should not be t athletes should to be paid student-athletes be paid? Words | 14 e athletes should be paid atives to internal-combustion engines on religion is ter analysis of the moon is down by john steinbeck and temperature production management helps in establishing a new steinbeck's east of eden - good versus evil essay. 28/15, 5:28 pm d: on 04/28/ debate as to whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up in recent years. It seems to arise every march when the ncaa men’s basketball tournament arrives, and once again when the college football season begins.

While i respect the time, work, and excitement college athletics brings to the world of sports, they should not be key in my statement is they shouldn’t be paid, i didn’t say they shouldn’t be ic scholarships are their compensation and a fair one at that. College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal ing to institute for college access & success, in the state of pennsylvania 71 percent of students leave a public four-year institution or private non-profit four-year institution in debt. That is an enormous burden for kids who may, or may not have a job awaiting them upon you look at it that way, plenty of college students would be happy to play a sport for four years if it meant they did not have to take on that financial r problem with paying college athletes is the ambiguity in the importance of each sport. No offense to the athlete who plays a sport that doesn’t air on national television but it doesn’t seem acceptable that they get paid the same amount as the college football player competing in the national championship with 33 million people watching them. Obviously those numbers are vastly different, so should the men and women basketball players be paid differently? Why shouldn’t those athletes be paid the same if they put in the same amount of time to practice, travel, and play games? Whether it is college football, or tournaments in college basketball, they have built up entities that drive up tv ratings. As a result they deserve the financial upturns for their excellent marketing get caught up that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting exploited. If players are that good and feel they deserve to be paid, they can make it to the professionals. The point is, the players who are so good and entertain us in college will eventually get need to drop the act that athletes are props and labor away for multi-billion dollar businesses. It will help them find a job when they graduate - - debt free - - out of college. There are thousands of students who don’t play sports and fail out of college each year and they receive little to no sympathy from the general a step back and look at the big picture. College is a place for people to obtain a degree and help jumpstart their “real world” career aspirations. However it is not a place for athletes to get paid to play sports, that’s why the professional level exists. Enable javascript to view the comments powered by why college athletes shouldn't get college athletes has been a trending topic around the national collegiate athletic association over the years. The discussion of paying college athletes began in 1991 when the famed fab five became a household name in the united states. The fab five first created controversy when they started to question why the university and university officials were making millions and millions of dollars off their names, and they were just deprived hungry college kids not making a dime. College athletes should not be paid for their performance or to perform for their universities because they are there for an education, questions will be asked, and universities would not make as big of an income off the hout the country young men and women are losing their priority for an education.

To attend a university should be a highly cherished privilege, and it should be an even greater honor to play athletics for the university. On is paid attention to by a lot of high school student athletes, but not only high school athletes but current college athletes. This question is maybe one of the reasons why a lot of college athletes leave college and go to the pros after just one year in college. Student athletes are not allowed to work much under ncaa regulations, and those who are in favor of paying them often point to that rule as a reason college athletes need money. But that reason isn’t enough for all coaches to share o’brien’s views toward paying student athletes. No, but they should be able to get what, say, a presidential scholar gets,” he said…. Words | 14 r major argument for not compensating college athletes is the fact that we have never done so in the past. Also, at a time of economic crisis, most universities have other things to worry about, especially because there is no system in place currently that allows student athletes to receive comparison of what student athletes get versus what they give makes it very obvious that they are exploited. College athletes should not get paid for some student-athletes attend college to play sports and that due to scheduling conflicts between class and practices they do not have full choice as to what major they would like to take (cooper, 12 – 13). The way football and basketball players in division i programs manage juggling sport and school, the mccormicks maintain, undermines the ncaa’s contention they are student-athletes. Economics: and why college athletes need to be ic association (ncaa) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. With universities grossing close to $200 million a year, college athletics has turned into one of the top industries in the world. The ncaa, a governing body of college athletics, currently holds all power in college athletics. I understand that college athletes do not deserve all the money they bring in but if one really thinks about it there is no where else in the world of economics is there a person that spends over forty hours a week and brings in $500,000 per year for their institution, yet they…. Athletes should be paid e athletes should be grow up loving to play sports in their free time. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. Words | 14 college athletes should not get paid for e economics: and why college athletes need to be about why college athletes should be e athletes: why they should be paid college athletes be paid? Athletes should be paid changes in communication technology and media have changed the way news companies produce and distribute information to the tion and entrepreneurship in the united arab emirates of prejudice stereotype and discrimination about flamethrowers: their psychological effects in about a brief biography of carlos about implication of border security and : 1543-9518 established ial board and ation porary sports exercise health & studies and sports a.

John acquaviva, notion of paying college football players has been an ongoing debate since the early 1900’s. This article takes a point/counterpoint approach to the topic of paying athletes and may have potential implications/consequences for college administrators, athletes, and coaches. John acquaviva defends the current system in which colleges provide an athletic scholarship that provides a “free college education” in return for playing on the university team. Dennis johnson follows with a counterpoint making the case that athletes in these sports should receive compensation beyond that of a college scholarship and forwards five proposals to pay the words: pay for play, athletic uction: history of the national collegiate athletic association (ncaa). Idea of paying college athletes to compete dates back to what is considered to be the first intercollegiate competition. The late 1800’s, football played by college teams was a brutal sport but enjoyed by many fans. He raised a question in an article entitled athletics in american college (originally published in 1930 but reprinted in 1999) “whether an institution in the social order whose primary purpose is the development of the intellectual life can at the same time serve an agency to promote business, industry, journalism, and organized athletics on an extensive commercial basis? In sum, the original 1929 report claimed that “big time” college sports were not educational, but were entirely financial and es during the early and mid-1900’s were routinely recruited and paid to play; and there were several instances where individuals representing the schools were not enrolled as students. Other athletes at colleges were given high paying jobs for which they did little or no work. In 1948, the ncaa adopted a “sanity code” that limited financial aid for athletes to tuition and fees, and required that aid otherwise be given based on need (5). There are more than 1,300 member institutions that represent an estimated 400,000 student athletes who participate in sport (21). Seemingly operating in a purely capitalistic/professional atmosphere, the ncaa continues to endorse an amateurism concept in college athletics. These competing, and often contradictory, values lead some college athletes in big time football and basketball programs to question the status quo of the present system through their words and actions. For example, many athletes are still attempting to get their “piece of the pie,” albeit under the table. And so it leads to our : college athletes should not be intensity of the argument to pay college athletes has escalated in the past few years. Perhaps it’s because of the current economic climate and everyone, including amateur athletes is looking for ways to make money? Or maybe it is due to the absurd coaches’ salaries and the money that colleges make from football bowl games and basketball tournaments? Regardless, this has magnified the fact that the athletes see none of these profits and thus begs the simple question: “where’s my share?

Census bureau, as reported by cheesman-day and newberger (7), expressed this best when they reported that the lifetime earnings for those with a college degree are over $1 million dollars more than non-graduates. Despite such a statistic, essays and op-ed columns continue to pour in from those who favor paying student-athletes while simultaneously refusing to acknowledge or accept the value of a college education. Sports-journalist in a recent national radio interview proposed that any argument against paying college athletes based on the sole reason that education is the prize is “antiquated”. But what seems antiquated and even shortsighted is the belief that paying a college athlete some (or even a lot of) money will solve all or even some of student’s long-term issues. The fear of the ncaa, as it should be, is that the mere notion of paying college athletes undermines the university’s primary purpose – education, something far more valuable than a modest annual stipend proposed by many. If it currently appears that the universities “don’t really care” about the athlete, paying them would intensify that belief, not dissolve irony in this dispute is that student-athletes do cost the university a substantial amount of money each year. But let’s address this main point head on: there is an obvious lack of appreciation of a college degree from those in favor of paying athletes, and until a genuine gratitude for this concept develops, this argument will probably continue to #2: there are problems with e the well-documented scandals and corruption in college athletics (30), many would probably agree that paying athletes would exponentially increase the need for intense ncaa oversight – an enormous task by all accounts. For example, how much should the athletes get paid and will payments be based on performance? But perhaps most important – what will happen to the non-revenue sports at the colleges who lose money from all of their sports programs – including football and basketball? That is, there are only a limited number of programs that make big money, but yet there are hundreds of schools who absorb big losses at the cost of providing athletes a place to compete and earn a degree. The purpose of the ncaa, along with amateur athletic union (aau), little league, and dozens of other organized forms of amateur sport is to provide a venue to play these sports – something we should not take for granted. Most students agree that colleges are self-contained acres of learning and socializing, all which takes place in a safe environment. In addition, athletes are improving their trade from the best coaching minds in the sport; not to mention having access to some of the best nutrition and strength/conditioning personnel. And perhaps the most overlooked benefits are that the school provides the player with high-profile name recognition, a dedicated fan base, media exposure, and a competitive atmosphere with proven rivals, all of which took decades, effort and money for each institution to #4: the athletic department has its in mind that student-athletes are not employees of the university, rather they are students first and athletes second. While it is true that the champion in football and men’s basketball (and most other sports for that matter) seem to come from a relatively small pool of universities, it might be safe to assume that paying athletes would create an even bigger disparity since so few universities actually make money. Let’s face it, we are an underdog-loving country, and paying athletes would all but ensure that teams like butler university, who made it to the final four in consecutive tournaments (2010 and 2011), will never do it #5: athletes know the the moment the full-scholarship papers are signed, each participant’s role is very clear: schools accept the responsibility of the student’s tuition, meal plan, and boarding, while the athlete is provided with the opportunity to earn a degree, engage in college life and play their favorite sport in a well-organized, and often high profile fashion. But frankly, the details of this agreement are well known by all involved, and rather strangely, no one seems to mind when signing conclusion, it should be noted that any ncaa improprieties or blatant corruption may have a carry-over effect into empathizing with the position given here. While corruption and other related-concerns are legitimate and need investigation, paying college athletes still remains a separate debate.

The position here is that, like many organizations, the ncaa should not be dismissed or discredited on one issue due to the mishandling of others. Further, if the contention is that many student athletes enter college unprepared or that athletics takes up too much time to excel (or even earn a degree), those are separate, but much needed arguments, and are not related to the issue of paying more than ever, we live in an era of entitlement. However, it now seems that a college education is not held in the same esteem and worse yet, some see it as simply an opportunity to earn money. Although it is now evident that there has been a failure to convince much of the public of the true value of an education, keeping college athletes as pure amateurs remains the right thing to r point: athletes in “big-time” sports should be argument that a college athletic scholarship is an equal quid pro quo for a college education has been utilized since athletic scholarships were approved by the ncaa in 1950’s. My colleague makes one point that is totally accurate – a college graduate can in fact make a great deal more money over a lifetime when compared to non-graduates. Furthermore, the athletic scholarship is only a one-year (renewable) agreement that can be terminated by the coach or university in any given year for any debating the pay-for-play issue in college athletics, the history of the governing body (i. Currently the ncaa), their mission and view of amateurism, the past history of college athletes benefitting financially, and the degree to which athletes benefit from the university experience must all be examined. In any case, that still does not cover the full cost of attending collegiate athletes coalition (cac) estimates that ncaa scholarships are worth about $2000 less than the cost of attending a university, as it does not account for expenses such as travel and sundries. Eitzen notes that athletes are sometimes mistreated physically and mentally and are often denied the rights and freedoms of other citizens. Much like the slaves who had no right to privacy, athletes are subject to mandatory drug testing (even though their coaches/masters are not tested), room checks, and limits on where they can and cannot go in the community. Early morning torture sessions), all in order to create obedient slaves; student rmore, collegiate athletics is often the only game in town for many of these athletes. For instance, football players must be in their third year of college or over the age of 21 to enter the national football league (nfl). Basketball players, on the other hand, must attend college for one year or ultimately sit out a year before they can enter the national basketball association (nba). Thus, the college game has become a “feeder system” similar to a minor professional league and it is in reality, “the only game in town. 2: athletes don’t know the “real” colleague is partially correct in that most student athletes know that they are getting a scholarship that will allow them to go to school and play a sport. Student-athletes are also a led to believe that they will play and receive a college degree while possibly picking up a few fringe benefits along the , for example, the recent stories regarding players like reggie bush, cam newton, or the players at ohio state who received money and/or other benefits as a result of playing football. Even though student athletes know they will not get directly paid for playing, many desire and even expect some form of compensation. Slack (25) surveyed 3,500 current and retired football players in 1989 only to find that 31% had received under the table money during their college careers and 48% knew of others who had received payments.

This seems to imply that while many recruits may indeed know “the deal”, they display their discontent by accepting payments or other benefits not currently allowed by the reality, the statement “athletes know the deal” with regard to academic achievement and degree completion seems to lack substance. Nathan tublitz, co-chair of the coalition on intercollegiate athletes, an organization of 51 faculty senates whose purpose is to remind college presidents, athletic directors, and coaches that student athletes are students first. And finally, do student athletes really know the “deal” when they penned their name on national signing day? Due to the plantation effect, however, many athletes are not able to take advantage of those events. For instance, few if any of the scholarship athletes would be allowed to play in an intramural contest for the coach’s fear of injury. Student athletes are also over-scheduled with study halls, practices, weight training sessions, film study, individual workouts, more practice, travel, and competition; all in an attempt to help athletes maintain focus on their and adler (1) spent five years recording systematic information regarding the athletes’ lives in a big-time college basketball program. Big man on campus), it became difficult for them to focus on y (8) reported that not all of the athletes in the adler & adler (1) study experienced academic detachment. Those who entered college well-prepared with appropriate high school courses, strong parental support and an ability to develop relationships outside of sport were able to succeed in the classroom. It’s important to note that too many minority athletes from low socioeconomic environments struggle in academics – an issue that is often perpetuated by the coaches. Against the wishes of the coaching staff, smith took the classes but was forced to sit out the season as red shirt athlete; a further example of the plantation (3) noted that one perspective was missing from the literature included a full expression from the black athletes point of view. Major finding of the benson (3) study was that the marginal academic performance was created by a series of interrelated practices engaged in by all significant members of the academic setting, including peers, coaches, advisors, teachers, and the student athletes themselves. Black student athletes received the message that school was not important, and that as time passed, they had no real control over their destiny in the classroom. Simply put, student athletes learned it was a matter of survival and a basic expectation to maintain a gpa just high enough to remain eligible to compete (3). He graduated from high school reading at a second grade level and went to el camino junior college. And the sad feature is that academic detachment from the university athletic department perspective doesn’t seem to be an issue because there are always more impoverished (and usually minority) kids waiting to come in and , student athletes in many cases cannot take advantage of the many extras offered by a college education. Why do athletes accept a diluted academic experience or the corruption of doctored transcripts, phantom courses, surrogate test takers, and tutors writing papers? George will argued that “college football and basketball are, for many players, vocations, not avocations, and academics are unsubstantiated rumors” (12, p. So do full scholarship athletes get a chance to take advantage of all the extras of the university experience?

Kahn (16) examined the operation of the college football and basketball systems of the ncaa and offers lessons about the determinants and effects of supply and demand. Specifically he utilizes economic principles to calculate the value of college football player to a university. When looking at the rent values based on college football or men’s basketball players’ performances, they are paid below a competitive level of compensation based on estimates of marginal revenue product produced of these players (6). This indicates that the ncaa does indeed use cartel power to pay top athletes less than the athlete’s market on a workload of 1000 hours per year and an average scholarship value, economist richard sheehan (16) calculated the basic hourly wage of a college basketball player at $6. He notes that the former president of the university of washington, william gerberding, said, “as one contemplates the obvious fact that so many of the most gifted athletes are economically and educationally disadvantaged blacks, this becomes less and less defensible. I have become increasingly uncomfortable about having a largely white establishment maintaining an elaborate system of rules that deprives student-athletes, many of whom are non-white, of adequate financial support in the name of the ideals of amateurism” (p. According to tulsa law school professor ray yasser, the best option for athletes to change the system for their benefit is to unite and “file an antitrust suit…against the ncaa and their universities, with the claim being that the ncaa and their universities are colluding to create a monopoly over the athlete’s ability to share in the profits generated from college athletics” (23, p. Thus, the following pay for play proposals are being submitted for would appear that ncaa should get out of the commercial business of football and basketball and follow the ivy league example of providing an environment that is truly amateur where student athletes actually are students first. California and nebraska have already passed state legislation that would enable colleges to compensate athletes; however they are blocked by the ncaa from doing so (23). Therefore, i submit five proposals that could possibly be implemented:Big ten plan and/or work study proposal: at the very least, the ncaa should follow former ncaa president miles brand’s suggestion and allocate athletes include a $2,000-$3,000 cost of living increase to full scholarships. Since athletes are supposedly only allowed to spend 20 hours per week involved with sport-related activities, this might actually be paid as 20 hours of work study or as a monthly living stipend. This would provide the athletes with the needed income for clothes, laundry, sundries, travel, and other small item als from the big ten are currently discussing a similar proposal that would help their athletes meet expenses not covered in an athletic scholarship. Big ten commissioner jim delany reports league athletic directors and university officials have seriously discussed using some of their growing tv revenue to pay athletes more. This proposal which would give athletes a $2,000-$5,000 per year living stipend also has the support of current ncaa president mark emmert (2). The proposal was supported by several other type of a proposal could pay athletes anywhere from $300-$1000 per game based on time played per game. Since most players do not play more than 30 minutes a game, a player could be paid on a per-minute of competition basis. At a rate of $20 per minute a player could net $600 for a game and approximately $6000-$7,000 per sional league proposal: ron woods (27) puts forth a proposal submitted by peter plagensa, visiting professor at middlebury college, regarding the pay-for-play issue. He appears to agree with the likes of stanley eitzen that the current practice of colleges and the ncaa do in fact “amount to a little more than a plantation system” (27, p.

He suggests that the big time college football and basketball maintain the million-dollar industry by making them an age 23 and under professional league. This proposal would allow universities to hire players as college staff (much like the cafeteria or groundskeepers) at moderate salaries plus room and board. Universities could also grant the athletes free academic classes until they earn a degree (even after playing days are over). Sharing proposal from tv/ncaa proceeds:“college basketball players watch the coach roaming the sidelines in his $1,500 custom-make suit. Tebow related on the daily show (26) that he joked with his college coach prior to a national championship game about getting a cut of his bonus money to ensure a victory. This brings another revenue sharing possibility to the surface: coaches sharing their bonuses and other performance incentives with the coaches in big time programs are paid huge bonuses based on team record and ranking, all a result of player performance. Isn’t it reasonable to expect the athletes to get a cut of the bonus money? The players) are the ones who put the coaches in a position to earn those colleague has argued in point #2 that paying athletes raise a myriad of other issues, such as how much should they receive, what happens if an athlete gets hurt, and so on. First, we must agree that it is fair to compensate ncaa division i football and basketball athletes beyond that of an athletic scholarship; then and only then may payout details be chronicled. Note: a reminder that we are only discussing compensation for the ncaa division i-a football and basketball players; not the athletes in the aau, little league or other truly amateur venues of organized hout the history of the ncaa, college athletes have routinely received compensation beyond that of a full college scholarship (e. While such compensation is illegal, athletes like reggie bush and others receive under-the-table benefits as evidenced in the slack survey (25). Many athletes in “big time” programs do not receive a degree for their efforts in the athletic arena. As seen in the research (1, 3), many athletes that aspire to be academically successful soon lose hope with the over-scheduling and pressures of sport preparation. As a result, many college athletes, a majority of which are minorities, fail out of school once coaches have utilized their ncaa functions like a cartel, keeping cost down while increasing profits. Million for men’s basketball (16), leading to a pseudo-plantation system where the coaches oversee the athletes demanding work and controlling their schedules on and off the field. The ncaa continues as a corporate entity and acting in a cartel-like fashion making millions of dollars a year, implementing a plan to pay student athletes for playing must be considered. Otherwise, america’s institutions of higher learning should follow the ivy league schools’ example and eliminate athletic scholarships, get out of the big time sport business, and get on with providing students with a complete educational ations in discussions within sport are more common or controversial than the debate to pay college athletes. The concession here is that despite any decision by the ncaa in the near future, we can be assured that college administrators, coaches, and athletes will continue this debate.

The athletic scholarship and the college national letter of intent: a contract by any other name. 2009-10 guide for college bound student athlete: where academics and athletic success is your goal. Degree programs bachelor of sports of sports of education in sports e athletes should not be paid up before the sunrise is a daily routine. Like most students, these athletes need money, but do not have a spare moment to work. The possibility of becoming a professional athlete and making the college athlete gets paid nothing to play the game that he or she loves. The ncaa bans their athletes from receiving payment in any way, even when sports are not involved. Greenlee states the case of darnell autry, “in the summer of ’96, autry, a theatre major who also played football for northwestern university, was prohibited by ncaa rules from getting paid to appear in a movie shot in italy” (67). Opposing view maintains that claiming that the ncaa does not pay its athletes is a ridiculous accusation. The purpose of the ncaa and all universities is to provide these athletes with an education and a degree. College athletes need to be paid because an average they practice up to five days a week during the season and also have lots of training in the offseason. Plus they have to attend school every day which gives college athletes no time to actually have a full functioning job to be able to buy groceries and other expenses. The athletes only have their scholarship to use for other payments if they have one and maybe there…. College athletes should be mitchell, president of california state university-bakersfield, ncaa division i board of directors states “head football coaches at the 44 ncaa bowl championship series schools received on average $2. Debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. Athletes being paid could also affect high school and pro sports as well which interests me more to research…. Think about it, if we pay athletes they won’t care as much about school, making their respected sport their main focus. This can be a bad situation because athletes would think “why go to class when i am still getting paid regardless? I know this would sound very appealing to many athletes, collecting checks and practicing without the worry about homework and class, but is this benefitting them in the long run?