For this project

On more accessible off more accessible > english > universal declaration > credits for this untry3in this ch guides and untry5credits for this untry2this project is the result of a global cooperative effort on the part of many partners:United nations agencies, programmes and other organs, including but not limited to:The office of the united nations high commissioner for human rights (ohchr) and its field presences,The international telecommunication union (itu),The united nations department of public information (dpi) and its information centres and services (unic and unis),The united nations development programme (undp) national offices, united nations educational, scientific and cultural organization (unesco), its regional offices and national commissions;. Individuals and of this project has been sponsored through an earmarked contribution by the government of the republic of san thank everyone who has generously placed their language skill at ohchr's untry4​​udhr translation udhr ation on languages and in sign translations: ​. A project's billing you are a billing administrator on only one billing account, new projects are automatically linked to your existing billing account. This article describes how to change the billing your project, as well as how to enable and disable billing for a you want to receive invoices or statements by email, or you want to receives them, billing contacts and the billing account for a change the billing account for an existing project, you must be an the project and a billing administrator on the destination billing information g administrators and billing permissions, ew of access change the billing account:Go to the google cloud platform the console left side menu and select you have more than one billing account, you'll be prompted to select linked billing account to manage the current project's projects linked to this billing account, locate the name of t that you want to change billing for, and then click the menu change billing account, then choose the desired s already incurred that have not yet been reported in the y will be billed to the former billing account. This can include up to 2 days prior to when the project was billing for a you enable billing depends on whether you're creating a new project 're re-enabling billing for an existing billing for a new you create a new project, you're prompted to choose which of your ts you want to link to the project. If you have only one billing account,That account is automatically linked to your you don't have a billing account, you must create one and enable billing project before you can use many google cloud platform features. New billing account and enable billing for your project, follow a new billing billing for an existing you have a project that you temporarily disabled billing for, you to the google cloud platform the projects list, select the project to re-enable billing the console left side menu and select billing . Link a billing e billing for a stop automatic payments for a project, you need to disable billing for t. Note that even if you disable billing, you're still be responsible outstanding charges on the account, which will be charged to your disable billing for a project:Go to the google cloud platform the left side menu and select you have more than one billing account, select go to linked t to manage the current project's billing. To locate a g account, select manage billing projects linked to this billing account, locate the name of t that you want to disable billing for, and then from the to it, select disable billing. You are prompted to confirm that to disable billing for this disable : instead of disabling billing, you might want down your ng down a project releases all resources used within the project. T owners can shut down or restore n: if your billing account remains disabled for a protracted period, ces might be removed from the projects associated with that account. Removed resources are not r your resources on the the google cloud console app to help you manage your as otherwise noted, the content of this page is licensed under the creative commons attribution 3. Courtesy the roy lichtenstein foundation; photo: shunk-kender; © the roy lichtenstein rauschenberg research project provides free worldwide access to a wealth of scholarly research and documentation relating to artworks by robert rauschenberg in sfmoma’s permanent collection. The rauschenberg research project was produced by sfmoma under the auspices of the getty foundation’s online scholarly catalogue initiative, with the support of the robert rauschenberg ship support for the rauschenberg research project is provided by the getty us support is provided by the robert rauschenberg ’s in this catalogue? Rauschenberg research project catalogs more than eighty-five artworks by robert rauschenberg from sfmoma’s permanent collection.

The featured works are indexed on the rauschenberg research project home page, which acts as an orientation point for the materials assembled in this project originally launched in july 2013. The october 2015 relaunch of sfmoma’s redesigned website precipitated the rauschenberg research project relaunch in february 2016. Navigation has been simplified and legacy urls from the previous design have been preserved and will be supported through all future iterations of the museum’s website to maintain the continuity and permanence of the project. A full list of preferred titles is available in the more links and info you are navigating within the project, a “rauschenberg research project” link will be visible at the top of each page. Clicking on that link will take you back to the project home artwork included in the project is documented with an artwork information page. Nineteen works have also been treated in scholarly essays commissioned for this publication, which may be found on the essay k informationon each artwork information page you will find a brief text and expandable sections containing ownership, exhibition, and publication histories; marks and inscriptions; and research materials (views of the artwork, commentary and interviews, and museum files). Notes at the bottom of these histories indicate when each one was last reviewed and whether or not it has been updated since the launch of the rauschenberg research project in july ch materials gathered for each artwork may include additional images, commentary, curatorial reference documents, and conservation notes and reports related to a given work, when available. Video interviews prepared as part of this project are always presented on pages that include a “part of the rauschenberg research project” link and are accompanied by searchable transcriptions that are also available as downloadable as of february 1, 2016, the project includes the following essays:“automobile tire print,” by sarah roberts. Since 1971 sfmoma has organized or hosted seven solo shows and served as the only west coast venue for the artist’s 1976 retrospective and the groundbreaking 1991 survey robert rauschenberg: the early tion (1954/1955) holds a special place in this history, having come to sfmoma as a gift from harry w. This critical early combine painting has anchored the museum’s gallery presentations of mid-century american art and served as a center of gravity for the growth of the rauschenberg holdings for more than forty years. This landmark purchase was made possible through the extraordinary support of phyllis wattis, with additional support from two other sfmoma trustees. The rauschenberg research project represents the culmination of sfmoma’s efforts to study and provide access to these works, a commitment to the artist that we have sought to honor since the time of the 1998 ons and essay pages include a citation tool that will generate the preferred citation for a selected passage of text. To activate the tool, highlight the area you would like to cite and click the “create citation” button that will appear along the right side of the citing full essays or other pages within the rauschenberg research project, please refer to the examples below. Where applicable, exceptions are noted in the citations provided on the essay pages or in related downloadable citations should include the following components: author’s name, “artwork title,” rauschenberg research project, july 2013. For artwork overview texts; ownership, exhibition, and publication histories; and marks and inscriptions should include the following components: “artwork title: section name,” rauschenberg research project, july 2013. Low-resolution versions of the images included in the rauschenberg research project are available for download in a file size suitable for powerpoint presentations.

In cases where copyright to the image or represented artwork is not held by the robert rauschenberg foundation, details about the rights holder(s) are noted in the accompanying image ship support for the rauschenberg research project is provided by the getty foundation. The foundation’s extraordinary generosity provided much-needed momentum and instrumental support for the rauschenberg research project. The osci project staff at sfmoma extends sincere gratitude to current and former foundation staff members deborah marrow, joan weinstein, anne helmreich, kristin kelly, nancy micklewright, hilary walter, and christina lopez, as well as to former program officer tina olsen, who planted the seeds of the initiative. Offer my deepest thanks to the staff and board of the robert rauschenberg foundation for their enthusiastic embrace of the project. Additional thanks to rauschenberg foundation and rauschenberg studio staff members present and past who have been indispensable to our research: julia blaut, thomas buehler, laurence getford, bradley jeffries, kayla jenkins, shanna kudowitz, matt magee, pedro sanchez, amanda sroka, lawrence voytek, and lawrence extraordinary number of individuals and institutions have given their time and assistance to the rauschenberg research project over the nearly five years that have passed from inception to publication. Sfmoma director neal benezra, and ruth berson, deputy museum director, curatorial affairs, were steadfastly committed to this project from the very start, ensuring its realization during a period of unprecedented growth and change within the institution. Special thanks are owed to director of collections and conservation jill sterrett for immediately grasping the wide-ranging impact and potential of the project and for being a mentor and advocate of the highest project benefited from the generosity of many individuals who knew and worked with robert rauschenberg, and who contributed their memories and insights: brigid berlin, carolyn brown, jasper johns, brice marden, knox martin, david myers, robert petersen, david prentice, yvonne rainer, dorothea rockburne, rachel rosenthal, calvin tomkins, charles yoder, and susan weil. Offer sincere gratitude to the scholars who contributed essays to the catalogue; their insightful perspectives amplify our understanding of this rich body of work and of rauschenberg’s contributions to the field of art. Mattison, jeffrey saletnik, and james merle project has been enriched greatly by the scholarship of others, and i am grateful for the counsel of amy schichtel, roger anthony, and jennifer field, willem de kooning foundation; roberta bernstein, jasper johns catalogue raisonné; julie barten, solomon r. Denise rohlfs transcribed hours of interview footage with grace, efficiency, and project touched nearly every department in the museum, often requiring people to step out of their accustomed roles and routines to tackle thorny problems. Chad coerver was a much-appreciated partner and interlocutor; his valuable perspectives on the implications of the project for all areas of the website and the museum’s long-term vision for digital publishing greatly enriched the end result. I am deeply thankful to leo ballate, andrew delaney, dana mitroff silvers, and layna white—the core contributors to the project’s technological requirements—whose sharp intellects and world-class senses of humor sustained the team through many long meetings and produced elegant solutions to convoluted problems of information architecture. Thanks also go to michelle barger and james gouldthorpe for their support throughout the project. Layna white’s team in collections information and access faced the project’s challenges with aplomb. Interns natalie mccann, dana ospina, and emily rhoads performed research, checked references, and took on photoshop tasks, providing essential support at different phases of the the marketing and communications office, katie tamony and her team thoughtfully brought the project to the attention of the public. Judy bloch offered ongoing editorial support and went above and beyond in the project’s final weeks to play a key role in the proofreading process.

For her formidable diligence, the project team extends wholehearted thanks to copy editor jennifer boynton, whose meticulous fact-checking and proofreading brought precision to every facet of the most profound thanks go bridget carberry, amanda glesmann, and meredith van dyke, whose superhuman efforts not only got the catalogue completed on schedule but also raised the finished product above all hopes and expectations. Bridget saw the project through the final stages of cms development and content loading, working with such efficiency and intelligence that she made it look easy. Without the commitment of these three, this catalogue simply could not have been brought to y, i give heartfelt thanks to my family—keith, jackson, ellie, and merry roberts, and susan rehm—whose warmth and humor provided much-appreciated balance, support, and w. The “from sfmoma” section links to the full versions of documents cited or excerpted in various areas of the project website and a publication that discusses sfmoma’s rauschenberg holdings more generally. Video from the duke university libraries, digital american masters: robert ons of robert rauschenberg's new york city studios and rauschenberg in new york in a larger ibe to the sfmoma ted search terms:Jump to contentjump to main navigationjump to section lives 1690 to , poverty and social policy in the navigationhomesearchbrowseliveshistorical backgroundthe project. For the project and choice of cal methodsdigitisation of lives and federated searching: connected g london lives: locating london's lives makes available, in a fully digitised and searchable form, a wide range of primary sources about eighteenth-century london, with a particular focus on plebeian londoners. This resource includes over 240,000 manuscript and printed pages from eight london archives and is supplemented by fifteen datasets created by other projects. Project directors are professors tim hitchcock and robert shoemaker and the project manager is dr sharon howard. Implemented by the humanities research institute at the university of sheffield and the higher education digitisation service at the university of hertfordshire, this website is published online guidance in using this site see the individual search pages and the research 's new (version 1. We have made this change in order to emphasise the wide range of searchable text available on this website. Unfortunately, for technical reasons it is still not possible to combine person name and keyword document display page now includes, in the grey summary box near the top of the page, a link to the relevant background page which provides information about that document have provided instructions on the london lives wiki homepage for what to do if you are unable to login using the same username and password you use for the main order to give credit to the full team that produced london lives, our citation guide now includes a recommended form for citing the whole project. In addition, the list of project staff and their responsibilities has been have fixed a bug which rendered some documents l corrections to the tagging and transcriptions have been made. For this reason it is important always to cite the current version number of the site (1. And date accessed, when composing citations to this directors of this project, and authors, with sharon howard, of all the historical background pages, are professor tim hitchcock (university of hertfordshire) and professor robert shoemaker (university of sheffield). Project manager is dr sharon technical officer responsible for implementing the search engine is jamie technical officers responsible for the automated markup were ed mackenzie and katherine senior data developer, in charge of all the tagging procedures, was dr philippa other data developers were anna bayman, eilidh garrett, carol lewis-roylance, susan parkinson, anna simmons, gwen smithson, nicola wilcox, and catherine london researcher was mary ale for the project and choice of ians studying the lives of the non-elite have a wealth of sources available, but these tend to be produced by institutions, and analysed in that context, thereby prioritising institutional considerations over those of their users. This project makes it possible to switch the research focus to individuals by allowing researchers to quickly locate all the relevant documents for particular people from a range of sources.

By examining how individual londoners engaged with and manipulated these agencies for their own ends, this project is designed to assess the role of plebeians in the evolution of social practices in the modern choice of sources included in london lives was largely determined by this research agenda, but also by practical considerations including which sources were available for digitisation and which were most likely to contain information on the same individuals. By including externally created datasets, the remit of the project was broadened to include a wider range of sources than would otherwise have been possible, and made it possible for the names in those datasets to be linked up with other lives of plebeian londoners most often intersected with institutional records when they were caught up in the criminal justice system, or sought poor relief or medical treatment. Our choice of sources was designed to capture this pattern of interaction, but we also sought to include comprehensive archival collections. We supplemented this with the most descriptive related records about serious crime available, including all surviving examples of the:Ordinary's accounts (oa): biographies of executed criminals written by the chaplain of newgate ns papers (ps): manuscript documents which provide additional evidence about the crimes tried at the old bailey and other courts, as well as documents concerning poor al registers (cr): lists of prisoners held in newgate rs's inquests (ic): documents relating to deaths thought to be suspicious, but which did not result in a formal the most part, these records pertain to the prosecution of felonies. For petty crimes, this website has fewer records, because the surviving records tend to be less descriptive. The records of three parishes have been comprehensively digitised for this project:St botolph aldgate (straddling the eastern boundary between the city of london and middlesex). This was one of the less prestigious companies and included a number of plebeian members. We have included the records of one of the royal hospitals, st thomas's hospital, including its detailed admissions and discharge this, we have included a number of externally created datasets which, although their focus is not always on plebeian londoners, do include information on many of the londoners who also appear in the records listed above. Other pages provide extensive background information about the institutions which created these project was made possible by a generous research grant from the economic and social research council. We are also grateful for assistance from the university of hertfordshire and the university of january 2011 this website won the british society for eighteenth-century studies prize for digital resources, and co-directors tim hitchcock and robert shoemaker were awarded the longman-history today trustees award for their "major contribution to history over the past year or years" with the old bailey and london lives section explains the methods used for the digitisation and markup of all the manuscript sources digitised for this project. For methods used in the development of the externally created datasets included on this website, see the relevant background pages relating to these resources. The one exception to this was the image files for documents held at the bridewell and bethlem archives, which were directly sourced from their online sation of the images was performed by the higher education digitisation service at the university of manuscript texts were manually typed by the process known as double rekeying whereby the text is transcribed twice, by two different typists, and then the two transcriptions are compared by computer. This process was carried out under the supervision of the higher education digitisation a perfectly clear and well-formed original text, this methodology results in an accuracy rate well over 99%. The particular focus of the project is on names, but we have also marked up occupations, places, and dates. The markup, however, is neither comprehensive nor entirely accurate and searches on this tagged information should be supplemented by keyword markup was done by a combination of automated and manual automated markup used a combination of dictionaries derived from the old bailey proceedings, a sample of manually tagged data from this project, and natural language processing to identify names, occupations, places and dates. A significant number of names could not be allocated a gender with this method and are labelled "unknowns".

Checking was then carried out by a team of data developers (see project staff), who eliminated false positives and added some markup missed by the automated process. Owing to the time-consuming nature of this process and the limited funding available, this manual markup procedure was not applied to all documents to the same level. This is particularly true of places and occupations, which were not marked up to the same level as of the search and statistics features are implemented using mysql. In the case of forenames, a look-up table of common forename variants has been created, and used to widen the search beyond names that sound like the search hri designed and implemented the interactive functionality of this website. More than simply a portal for accessing these historical resources, this project used natural language processing techniques (also used in london lives) in order to remotely tag previously unstructured texts and allow consistent structured searching of names, places and dates. Users can compare this evidence with evidence of parish population densities; crime locations and defendant residences from the old bailey proceedings; plague and taxation records from the centre for metropolitan history; and archaeological records of clay pipes and accessioned glass from the museum of london archaeology lives is a not-for-profit project whose sole objective is to make the documents and data it contains available for private use to all internet users free of charge. All profits derived from this advertising will be devoted to maintaining and upgrading the would like to thank the following institutions and individuals for their generous help with the project:Our major funder, the economic and social research council, and the universities of hertfordshire and sheffield for making this project libraries and archives (listed under copyright information) who permitted us to reproduce and transcribe page images of their original creators of databases (listed on the relevant dataset background pages) who permitted us to incorporate their data into this duncan and viki philpott, who contributed to the project as postgraduate interns researching and writing several ts taking hst 2024 poor man, sick man, beggar man, thief at the university of sheffield in the autumn semester 2009 who contributed some of the wales who read and proofread all the background the researchers, including undergraduate and postgraduate students, identified on the appropriate pages, who contributed to writing the ne, listed under the acknowledgements for the old bailey project, who made possible the creation of the old bailey proceedings online, without which this project would not have been humanities research institute, university of sheffield, its former director professor david shepherd, michael pidd, hri digital manager, and julie banham, hri coordinator, for providing extensive technical and secretarial support for the project as well as a congenial home for the project former higher education digitisation service, university of hertfordshire, and in particular asif mohammed farook and ian brearey, for managing the scanning and rekeying of documents; and brian robinson, former director of ical ntly asked ght & citation n 1. April welcome your feedback on this web pcopyright & citation guidevisual designtechnical ad general instructions - l application guide for nih and other phs 424 (r&r) - forms version d released: march 24, 2017. 220 - r&r other project information r&r other project information form is used for all grant applications. This form includes questions on the use of human subjects, vertebrate animals, and environmental impact. This form also has fields to upload an abstract, project narrative, references, information on facilities, and equipment human subjects involved? Yes/ this project involve activities outside of the united states or partnerships with international collaborators? Summary/graphy & references ties & other onal instructions for fellowship:This r&r other project information form should be completed in consultation with the sponsor and administrative officials at the sponsoring institution. Field is activities involving human subjects are planned at any time during the proposed project at any performance site, check "yes. Check "yes" even if the proposed project is exempt from regulations for the protection of human subjects, or if activities involving human subjects are anticipated within the period of award but plans are activities involving human subjects are not planned at any time during the proposed project at any performance site, select "no" and skip the rest of the "1. Applications that involve the use of human materials that check "no" for human subjects involvement must provide a clear justification about why this use does not constitute human subjects research.

Phs 398 career development award supplemental form, protection of human onal instructions for training:Check "yes" if training plans include or potentially will include involvement of trainees in projects that include human subjects as defined by 45 cfr many instances, trainees supported by institutional training grants will participate in research that is supported by separate research project grants for which institutional review board (irb) approval or a determination of exemption exists. The awardee institution is responsible for maintaining documentation of fwa and irb approvals for all trainee research projects and for providing these to nih if es may not design or conduct independent human subjects research as part of the training award unless the institution where the research will be conducted has an approved fwa on file with ohrp and irb approval. Phs 398 research training program plan form, human onal instructions for fellowship:In many instances, the fellow will be participating in research supported by research project grants for which the irb review of human subjects is already complete or an exemption has been designated. This review or exemption designation is sufficient, provided that the irb determines that participation of the fellow does not substantially modify the you have answered "yes" to the "are human subjects involved? Phs fellowship supplemental form, protection of human onal instructions for multi-project:Overall component: if activities involving human subjects are planned at any time during the proposed project at any performance site and/or on any other component, check "yes" to the "are human subjects involved? Yes/ the project is exempt from federal regulations, check "yes" and check the appropriate exemption subjects research should only be designated as exempt if all of the proposed research projects in an application meet the criteria for the project is not exempt from federal regulations, check "no. More information, see the nih's exempt human subjects research yes, check appropriate exemption number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6:If you selected "yes" to "is the project exempt from federal regulations," select the appropriate exemption six categories of research that qualify for exemption are defined in the common rule for the protection of human subjects. Because nih does not require irb approval at the time of application, the exemptions designated often represent the opinion of the pd/pi, and the justification provided for the exemption by the pd/pi is evaluated during peer onal instructions for multi-project:Overall component: check all the exemptions identified in all the other components: if the overall component exemption is only e4 (box 4 is checked) then no other exemption number can be set for any other no, is the irb review pending? Just-in-time policy for more onal instructions for multi-project:Other components: skip the "irb approval date" subject assurance number:Enter the approved federalwide assurance (fwa) number that the applicant has on file with ohrp. In this case, the applicant organization, by the signature in the certification section on the g. The latest irb approval date must be within one year of the application due onal instructions for multi-project:Other components: skip the "human subject assurance number" field. Field is activities involving vertebrate animals are planned at any time during the proposed project at any performance site, check "yes. This attachment must be submitted and reviewed prior to the involvement of animals in any research onal instructions for career development:If you have answered "yes" to the "are vertebrate animals used? This attachment must be submitted and reviewed prior to the involvement of animals in any research onal instructions for training:In many instances, trainees supported by institutional training grants will participate in research that is supported by a separate research project grant for which the iacuc review and approval exist. This existing iacuc approval is sufficient for trainees provided that the research would not be substantially modified by the participation of a that trainees may only participate in vertebrate animal research that is being conducted at an institution that has an approved animal welfare assurance on file with the office of laboratory animal welfare (olaw) and that has iacuc approval. The awardee institution is responsible for maintaining documentation of the animal welfare assurance and iacuc approvals for all trainee research projects and providing these to nih if es may not design or conduct independent vertebrate animal research as part of the training award unless the institution has an approved animal welfare assurance on file with olaw and iacuc approval has been obtained.

This detailed information must be submitted to the nih awarding ic for prior institution must ensure that trainees are enrolled in the institution's animal welfare training and occupational health and safety programs for personnel who have contact with animals. It is the institution's responsibility to ensure that trainees are properly supervised when working with live vertebrate policies apply to all performance onal instructions for fellowship:In many instances, the fellow will be participating in research supported by research project grants for which the iacuc review has been obtained. This review is sufficient, provided that participation of the fellow does not substantially modify the research. This attachment must be submitted and reviewed prior to the involvement of animals in any research onal instructions for multi-project:Overall component: if activities involving vertebrate animals are planned at any time during the proposed project at any performance site and/or on any other component, check "yes" and complete the remaining questions as components: answer only the "are vertebrate animals used? This attachment must be submitted and reviewed prior to the involvement of animals in any research studies. Just-in-time onal instructions for multi-project:Other components: skip the "iacuc approval date" welfare assurance the federally approved assurance number, if "none" if the applicant organization does not have an office of laboratory animal welfare (olaw)-approved animal welfare determine whether the applicant organization holds an animal welfare assurance with an associated number, see the lists of domestic and foreign assured institutions. Do not enter the animal welfare assurance number for a project/performance site of a collaborating an applicant organization does not have an animal welfare assurance number, the authorized organization representative's signature on the application constitutes declaration that the applicant organization will submit an animal welfare assurance when requested by the animal work will be conducted at an institution with an animal welfare assurance and the applicant organization does not have the following:An animal care and use program;. To house animals and conduct research on site; , the applicant must obtain an inter-institutional assurance from olaw prior to an onal instructions for multi-project:Other components: skip the "animal welfare assurance number" question. This statement can be included at the top of each page as a grant is awarded as a result of or in connection with the submission of this application, the government shall have the right to use or disclose the information to the extent authorized by law. Does this project have an actual or potential impact - positive or negative - on the environment? Field is te whether or not this project has an actual or potential impact on the nih research grants are not expected to individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the environment, and nih has established several categorical exclusions allowing most applicants to answer "no" unless a specific foa indicates that the national environmental policy act (nepa) applies. However, if an applicant expects that the proposed project will have an actual or potential impact on the environment, or if any part of the proposed research and/or project includes one or more of the following scenarios, check "yes. If this project has an actual or potential impact on the environment, has an exemption been authorized or an environmental assessment (ea) or environmental impact statement (eis) been performed? Does this project involve activities outside of the united states or partnerships with international collaborators? Field is te whether this project involves activities outside of the united states or partnerships with international collaborators. To nih and other phs agencies must check "yes" if the applicant organization is a foreign institution or if the project includes a foreign component.

Human subjects, animals, disease, equipment, and techniques), including the reasons why the facilities or other aspects of the proposed project are more appropriate than a domestic setting. Instructions for fellowship:If you have checked "yes" to question 6, and are including a "foreign justification" attachment, you should include in your justification a description of how the mentor at the foreign site will contribute the scientific advantages of the foreign training experience as compared to the training available onal instructions for multi-project:Overall component: if the answer to question 6 is "yes" for any other component, then you must answer "yes" for the overall component. Project summary/ "project summary/abstract" attachment is project summary is a succinct and accurate description of the proposed work and should be able to stand on its own (separate from the application). This section should be informative to other persons working in the same or related fields and understandable to a scientifically literate reader. A summary which exceeds this length will be flagged as an error by the agency upon submission. You will need to take corrective action before the application can be this information as a pdf file. See the format attachments the application's broad, long-term objectives and specific aims, making reference to the health relatedness of the project (i. Be sure that the project summary reflects the key focus of the proposed project so that the application can be appropriately not include proprietary, confidential information or trade secrets in the project summary. If the application is funded, the project summary will be entered into an nih database and made available on the nih research portfolio online reporting tool (report) and will become public that the "project summary/abstract" attachment is not same as the "research strategy" onal instructions for career development:In addition to summarizing the research project to be conducted under the career development award, describe the candidate's career development plan, the candidate's career goals, and the environment in which the career development will take place. The entire "project summary/abstract" attachment is limited to 30 lines of onal instructions for training:In addition to the content described above, also summarize the objectives, rationale and design of the research training program. Undergraduate, predoctoral, postdoctoral, faculty) and duration of the proposed training, the projected number of participating trainees and their anticipated levels of experience. The entire "project summary/abstract" attachment is limited to 30 lines of onal instructions for multi-project:Overall and other components: a project summary is required for both the overall component and all other components. Each project summary attachment is limited to 30 lines of "project narrative" attachment is be the relevance of this research to public health in, at most, three sentences. If the application is funded, this public health relevance statement will be combined with the project summary (above) and will become public onal instructions for multi-project:Overall component: the "project narrative" attachment is components: refer to the specific foa to determine whether the "project narrative" attachment is required for any other components. Bibliography & references must complete the "bibliography & references cited" attachment:The "bibliography & references cited" attachment is required unless otherwise noted in the this information as a pdf file. Phs fellowship supplemental onal instructions for multi-project:Overall and other components: the "bibliography & references cited" attachment should include any references cited in g.

Do not include lists of publications of project directors, mentors or trainees in this section, as this information will be included in the biosketches and data onal instructions for multi-project:Overall and other components: unless specific instructions are provided in the foa, applicants have the option of including the "bibliography & references cited" attachment in the overall component, other components, or both. Support, such as career enrichment programs, assistance and guidance in the supervision of trainees involved with the esi's project, and availability of organized peer groups;. This could also include, for example, space, shared laboratory facilities and equipment, funds for curriculum development, release time for the pd/pi and participating faculty, support for additional trainees in the program, or any other creative ways to improve the environment for the establishment and growth of the research training onal instructions for fellowship:Include a detailed description of the institutional facilities and resources available to the fellowship applicant. The information provided is of major importance in establishing the feasibility of the goals of the fellowship training onal instructions for multi-project:Unless specific instructions are provided in the foa, applicants have the option of including the "facilities & other resources" attachment in the overall component, other components, or onal instructions for sbir/sttr:The research to be performed by the applicant small business concern and its collaborators must be in united states facilities that are available to and under the control of each party for the conduct of each party's portion of the proposed project. Foreign sites must be approved by the funding "equipment" attachment is this information as a pdf major items of equipment already available for this project and, if appropriate, identify the equipment's location and pertinent onal instructions for multi-project:Unless specific instructions are provided in the foa, applicants have the option of including the "equipment" attachment in the overall component, other components, or both (whichever is most appropriate for your application). Changing the file name may cause delays in the processing of your this sba registry pdf in question questions and for technical assistance concerning the sba company registry, contact , cdc sbir and crp only:Sbir application certification for small business concerns that are majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms (e. Not majority vcoc-owned) should not fill out this certification and should not attach it to their application ad the "sbir application vcoc " at the nih forms & applications the 3 questions and check the certification authorized business official must sign the the certification using the original file name ("sbir application vcoc ). Changing the file name may cause delays in the processing of your this certification pdf in question 12.