Literary research methodology
Related slideshares at ture based research hed on may 10, s involved in conducting literature based research you sure you want message goes you sure you want message goes you sure you want message goes state you sure you want message goes t faculty at south african theological african theological da line at twilight t at sanata dharma ture based research personal experience students knowledge and understanding of research questioning the purpose of the dissertation 1) what in essence are we trying to achieve ? Research mindedness , knowledgeable and – the dissertationresearch basedliterature based research methodologygetting students to engage in the processimportance of language engaging them as researchers rather than students changing a mindset & inculcating a different form of ophical basis empirical research non-empirical research positivism/ naturalism positivism/naturalism research methodology quant/qual systematic/traditional review research methodspeople/object of study the literature is the populationis the populationobservation, interviews are examples different data bases are used & literature isof data collection tool the „textual‟ ture based research methodology hasoften been referred to in many texts as : literature reviewto some extent this is true but the problem is that as such it has blurred the understanding between literature review as a methodology in its own right and its utilisation in the process of empirical research.
So we need to differentiate between the two ture based methodology – designing a research project where existing literature is the population where the researcher needs to go for: sampling data collection data analysis tutes two types1. Traditional literature review [also known as narrative or tion: “ a scientific tool which can be used to summarise, appraise and communicate the results and implications of otherwise unmanageable quantities of research” [ crd report 4: 2001]philosophical basis:positivism – quantitative methodologypurpose:to synthesise the results of a number of small ale: small studies- design may be rigorous but may lack statistical power to show significant ology: quantitative approach may include meta-analysis [the specific statistical method to combine results from different studies into single summary estimate for quick reference].
Research process research problem research question[s] carrying out the review- searching the data - critical analysis of the data - combining and synthesising the databasically it is a: reanalysis of results reanalysis of findingsmethod of data analysis descriptive data extraction tool. Methodology in its own right epistemological basis:interpretivism: comprehensive reviewmay combine positivist criticism here is: methodological- not based on explicit specified method no clear cut steps in key issue: to ensure that the quality and rigour of the research is demonstrated and the link is made apparent from beginning to are the students required to do?
Students in the gical issuesthe process should be the same as empirical designfour main considerations:1) defining the research problem and posing the research question2) overview of the literature to support the study3) methodology – design of the study4) ethics and ethical approval. The research problem [ may come from practice ]examples may be as issue with: domestic violence patient experience with obesity transition to motherhood postnatal depression attending to patients spiritual needs effective communication with the research question: may start with reflecting on a particular issue from practice that the student has observed.
1) policies 2) protocols 3) guidelines working research ew of the literature:purpose what exists on the subject if enquiry identify gaps in knowledge confirms the research question reformulation of the research question support feasibility of the study. Search terms reviewing the search terms, data ion criteria- defines the boundaries of the study type of data – research papers to include both qualitative and quantitative methodology language and context time frame- e.
1990 – 2011 a variety of studies- research as well as grey literatureexclusion criteria papers that are not current research conducted externally any other methodology – i. Data extraction tool + a theoretical data extraction toolcan be constructed by using: a combination of research critique frameworks precise identification of the information to be can it do?
Enables a schematic presentation of findings enables development of student own thinking and sing the data appraising how the authors have arrived at their findings, themes and conclusions background of the authors have they been true to their chosen methodology? Theoretical frameworks epistemological orientation findings and relationship to the research question contribution to existing sis of the data :may calls for the examination of the findings in the following contextsdisciplinary contextprofessional educationprofessional has these contexts shaped the essence the research findings and the contribution to evidence ?
Can be organised in themesaddress how the primary researchers arrived at themesdiscussion and implications for practice can the evidence be trusted? Has the research question been answered what are the challenges for the area of practice?
Conclusion and ting the research cyclewhat are the issues: quality of evidence understanding of knowledge utilisation of knowledge protocols and policies barriers to implementation of research political issues economical issues ethical from secondary to primary methodologyideally students should be advised to raise future research d. London: sage ng to run course - linkedin course - linkedin ng techniques: creating multimedia course - linkedin ture review in research ch methodology for research in ture review in ture review (review of related literature - research methodology).
Please try again hed on mar 15, 2014union institute and rd youtube autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play ry research guidelines and a ry research/critical to write a literary research terms in research methodology | dr. Shuchi to research to develop a good research ry criticism - a general approach and research techniques.
Research aim, questions and to start a research ch methodology: 5 steps, 4 types and 7 ethics in to write a research paper and a literature review ch methodology course (self-study). S13643-016-0343-0pmcid: pmc5059917reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative researchstephen j.
Ann mckibbon11department of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, mcmaster university, hamilton, ontario canada 2faculty of social work, university of calgary, alberta, canada 3school of nursing, mcmaster university, hamilton, ontario canada 4canchild centre for childhood disability research, mcmaster university, 1400 main street west, iahs 408, hamilton, on l8s 1c7 canada stephen j. Suri [10] has recently retooled patton’s well-known typology of purposeful sampling strategies (originally intended for primary research) for application to literature synthesis, providing a useful resource in this abstractionthe purpose of data abstraction in rigorous literature reviews is to locate and record all data relevant to the topic of interest from the full text of included publications, making them available for subsequent analysis.
In these cases, we systematically documented the modification to the form and returned to previously abstracted publications to abstract any information that might be relevant to the new logic of this strategy is analogous to the logic used in a form of research synthesis called best fit framework synthesis (bffs) [23–25]. Both the strategy proposed and the bffs approach to research synthesis are notable for their rigorous and transparent means to adapt a final set of concepts to the content under ting for inconsistent terminologyan important complication affecting the abstraction process in methods overviews is that the language used by authors to describe methods-related concepts can easily vary across publications.
For example, authors from different qualitative research traditions often use different terms for similar methods-related concepts. For example, in the overview on sampling [18], we aimed to produce a comparative analysis of how multiple sampling-related topics were treated differently within and among different qualitative research traditions.