Research paper discussion section

The purpose of this guide is to provide advice on how to develop and organize a research paper in the social of research flaws to ndent and dependent ry of research terms. Choosing a research ing a topic ning a topic ing the timeliness of a topic idea. An oral g with g someone else's to manage group of structured group project survival g a book le book review ing collected g a field informed g a policy g a research purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the research problem being investigated, and to explain any new understanding or insights about the problem after you've taken the findings into consideration. The discussion will always connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction; the discussion should always explain how your study has moved the reader's understanding of the research problem forward from where you left them at the end of the ey thomas m. Clinical chemistry 56 (november 2010): ance of a good section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you:Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under t the underlying meaning of your research, note possible implications in other areas of study, and explore possible improvements that can be made in order to further develop the concerns of your ght the importance of your study and how it may be able to contribute to and/or help fill existing gaps in the field. If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of ey thomas m. San francisco edit, ure and writing are the general rules you should adopt when composing your discussion of the results:Do not be verbose or concise and make your points a logical stream of thought; in general, interpret and discuss the significance of your findings in the same sequence you described them in your results the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works or prior studies in the past needed, use subheadings to help organize your discussion or to categorize your interpretations into content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes:Explanation of results: comment on whether or not the results were expected for each set of results; go into greater depth when explaining findings that were unexpected or especially profound. If appropriate, note any unusual or unanticipated patterns or trends that emerged from your results and explain their meaning in relation to the research nces to previous research: either compare your results with the findings from other studies or use the studies to support a claim.

Writing the discussion section of a research paper

This can include re-visiting key sources already cited in your literature review section, or, save them to cite later in the discussion section if they are more important to compare with your results instead of being a part of the general literature review of research used to provide context and background information. Note that you can make this decision to highlight specific studies after you have begun writing the discussion ion: a claim for how the results can be applied more generally. For example, describing lessons learned, proposing recommendations that can help improve a situation, or highlighting best esis: a more general claim or possible conclusion arising from the results [which may be proved or disproved in subsequent research]. This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a result of your . Organization and the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper:Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. The same key terms, narrative style, and verb tense [present] that you used when when describing the research problem in your by briefly re-stating the research problem you were investigating and answer all of the research questions underpinning the problem that you posed in the be the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective. The order of interpreting each major finding should be in the same order as they were described in your results section.

This part of the discussion should begin with a description of any unanticipated findings, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study. The exception to discussing findings in the same order you described them in the results section would be to begin by highlighting the implications of a particularly unexpected or significant finding that emerged from the study, followed by a discussion of the remaining concluding the discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses if you do not plan to do so in the conclusion. Discussion section should end with a concise summary of the principal implications of the findings regardless of significance. Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings and conclusions of your study are important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the research problem. Reiterate the research problem/state the major y reiterate the research problem or problems you are investigating and the methods you used to investigate them, then move quickly to describe the major findings of the study. After reading the discussion section, you want the reader to think critically about the results [“why didn't i think of that? You don’t want to force the reader to go through the paper multiple times to figure out what it all means. If applicable, begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most significant or unanticipated finding first, then systematically review each finding.

Relate the findings to similar study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. The discussion section should relate your results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for your research. This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps to support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your study differs from other research about the topic. Note that any significant or unanticipated finding is often because there was no prior research to indicate the finding could occur. If there is prior research to indicate this, you need to explain why it was significant or . Consider alternative explanations of the is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. Make suggestions for further may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper].

Although your study may offer important insights about the research problem, this is where you can address other questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or highlight previously hidden questions that were revealed as a result of conducting your research. You should frame your suggestions by linking the need for further research to the limitations of your study [e. Or to critical issues revealed from the data that were not considered initially in your : besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources is usually found in the discussion section. If a study that you cited disagrees with your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs. An example would be: “in the case of determining available housing to single women with children in rural areas of texas, the findings suggest that access to good schools is important," then move on to explaining this endations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections. Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this not introduce new results in the discussion section. The description of findings [results] and the interpretation of their significance [discussion] should be distinct sections of your paper. If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and your own interpretation of each of the first person is generally acceptable.

The anatomy of an article: the discussion section: "how does the article i read today change what i will recommend to my patients tomorrow? As such, you should always approach the selection and interpretation of your findings introspectively and to think critically about the possibility of judgmental biases unintentionally entering into discussions about the significance of your work. Of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretation of those results and their significance in relation to the research problem, not the data , beth. For example, if the purpose of your research was to measure the impact of foreign aid on increasing access to education among the poor in bangladesh, it would not be appropriate to speculate about how your findings might apply to populations in other countries without drawing from existing studies to support your claim or if analysis of other countries was not a part of your original research design. Be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. Sometimes your professor will encourage you to expand your discussion of the results in this way, while others don’t care what your opinion is beyond your efforts to interpret the , beth. Suppl 1); 2013 s:article | pubreader | epub (beta) | pdf (279k) | video is queuequeuewatch next video is sion section in research cribe from dr.

Please try again hed on oct 15, 2015writing a discussion in for a research rd youtube autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play to write the discussion part g a discussion for a research paper or ch paper outline s, discussion conclusion to write a great research paper fast - result and tion g in the sciences: for writing discussion chapter style - writing the results and discussion ic writing: positioning yourself in the discussion section of research sitat politècnica de valència - writing discussions/conclusions part state graduate g a discussion for ative analysis of interview data: a step-by-step guide. 6 discussion section of a paper 15 g a research g scientific papers: 7 discussion and to discuss a topic in a english with rebecca [engvid rebeccaesl].