Research ethics cases
11-04t20:06:33+00:ch ethics case click a study for more information, or use the search box to find specific ss in subject selection: comparing suburban and inner-city of prisoner with parkinson disease seeks high-risk ts at high-risk for aids used in aids ch related injuries in hiv vaccine al harm in native american samples and hd ty, contract, privacy rights in the human ch deception in the g informed scenarios concerning anonymous c testing of high school gy study guised as a “program”. Privacy, and public health obligations at conflict in aids follow-up process: obligations of researchers to anonymous -risk genetic therapy best done on minors? Making deals with other -authorship in the g the grave: investigator takes ownership of deceased scholar’s of data sharing in collaborative and non-collaborative research.
Review article without its stinating stinating researcher delegates reviews to jeopardy: researcher’s proposal gets rejected tism in the editing of lawsuit by researchers thwart publishing of article on questionable e fails to cite “historical” y about the istent findings between trainee and istent data amongst carelessness constitute research researcher signs away intellectual rights despite university patenting negotiations in collaborative ectual rights involving multiple d idea for ing adverse tion or research in domization in trial designs and research tearoom trade m’s obedience tuskegee syphilis tis studies at the willowbrook state school for ial inability to provide informed consent due to ing perceptions of risks and g community involvement in informed ing self-injurious g at cross ed study of the natural course of ting survey research with anxiety disordered ng fair representation of minority children in o trials with prevalent but unproven ch in a war s of parental permission for research with gay and entiality and using community members as ened protections in clinical t and psychosis-inducing g consent to do research on institutionalized ing informed consent to participate in everyone feel like a lding study purpose. Sign from the ng vulnerable emotional disturbance ting research ining privacy in ering children’s g parental e on the g to of permission and ch or services? Issues in longitudinal research with at-risk children and of informed consent for research with juvenile ing findings of adolescent mental health issues discovered in research.
Modest” research proposal on alcohol disclosure: use of control groups in behavioral intervention or plastic? From paper records to electronic ts as research ting clinical drug trials with control or not to ng patients for a problem-solving intervention for suicidal young old data to explore new research ting confidentiality when conducting an internet ch with sex to ethically kill two birds with one oiroir leadership & staffmichael gottesman, d g. Opher wanjek, innovation awardlong-term irp planningoir officesirp websiteone programmany peopleinfinite possibilitiesa premier environment where creative scientists conduct fundamental research for the betterment of human health – we are the irpvisit websitesourcebookboard of scientific directorsscientific director membership rosterboard of scientific directors sub-committeescommittees advisory to the ddiradvisory committee to the ddirassembly of scientists (aos)committee on scientific conduct and ethics (csce)central tenure committee (ctc)chairs of boards of scientific counselorstenure-track investigators committeetraining directors committeefellows committee (felcom)office of intramural training and education (oite) steering committeepostbacc committeesenior biomedical research service (sbrs) policy boardwomen scientist advisors (wsa) committeeintramural clinical research steering committeehuman subjects research advisory committee (hsrac)animal research advisory committee (arac)dual use research of concern (durc) committeenih intramural embryonic stem cell research oversight (escro) committeefacilities working groupnih space recommendation boardphs technology transfer policy boardprocesses for reviewing nih intramural scienceboards of scientific counselors (bsc)blue ribbon panel reviews of ic intramural research programsguidelines for the review of scientific directorsintramural program oversightintramural data sharinggenomic data sharinghuman data sharingguide to fdaaa reporting research resultsassistance available to help with results reporting to oratory safetymanagement controls surveyintramural administrative management councillist of council memberslist of trans-nih committeespersonnelipds and appointment mechanismsofficial list of approved intramural professional designations (ipds)senior investigatorinvestigatorsenior cliniciansenior scientistassistant clinical investigatorstaff clinicianstaff scientistsenior research assistant / research assistantadjunct investigatorscientist emeritusintramural research training award (irta) fellowvisiting felloworise senior fellowsenior clinical fellowclinical fellowsenior research fellowresearch fellowstudent opportunitiescontractorsguest researchers / special volunteersresearch collaboratorsrecruitment processes, policies, and checklistssearch process for senior investigators, tenure-track investigators, senior clinicians and senior scientists5-year / 8-year duration ruleexample ic check sheets / checklistsexceptional extensions of irta and visiting fellowships to a 6th yearguidelines for early termination of awards to postdoctoral fellowskeep the thread policymandated training for scientific staff working in nih facilitiespolicy for use of contract workers to support scientific functions in the irppolicy on use of english for official scientific communication in nih laboratories and branchesworking with displaced title 42 staff scientists/cliniciansirp demographicsintramural research program personnel demographics (end fy16)foreign nationals in the intramural research program (end fy16)sabbaticalsninds intramural scientist development programniaaa sabbatical programnei sabbatical programnichd sabbatical programphs foreign work / study program policyopportunities for short assignments / details at the nihtenure in the nih intramural research programtenure-track overviewsearch & selectionsearch process for senior investigators, tenure-track investigators, senior clinicians and senior scientistsrole of search committee membersadditional tenure-track policiesresourcespolicy on review of ic tenure committeestenure overviewsearch & selectioncriteria for tenure at the nihde-tenuring processawards, fellowships, & grant opportunitiesthe director’s challenge innovation award programcall for proposalsearly career (bridge) awards open to irp scientistseligibility of intramural investigators for nih roadmap fundsk99/r00 grant award informationapplication approval process and additional informationk99/r00 environment and institutional commitment statementupdate from scientific directorsniaid support of intramural biodefense research from ics other than niaidethical conductresearch ethicsnih policiesintramural / extramural collaborationsnih staff involvement on extramural awards - cooperative agreementsopportunities for collaborative research at the clinical center (u01)nih bench-to-bedside programactivities with outside organizationsinvestigation of allegations of research misconductnih guidelinesguide for human biospecimen storage and trackingproposed procedure for requesting the disposal or sharing / release of nih biospecimensfrequently asked questionslist of biospecimen liaisonsspecial research considerationsdual-use researchuse of human stem cellsareas of prohibited researchabortionhuman embryo prohibitionsguidelines for human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cellsinduced pluripotent stem (ips) cellsuse of ips cells linesnih guidelines for ips cell researchips cell registryacquisition of ips cells in the irp (mou)human embryonic stem (hes) cellsuse of hes cell linesacquisition of hes cell linesfetal tissue researchoversight of fetal tissue researchfaqs on the policy and procedures for research using human fetal tissue in the irpguidelines for ordering human fetal tissuelanguage for intramural agreements that involve fetal tissuepolicy and procedures for obtaining human fetal tissue for research purposes in the intramural research program at nihreminder for intramural investigators of legal requirements regarding acquisition and use of human fetal tissueresponsible conduct of research traininginstruction in responsible conduct of research - postdoc irta, crta, vf, research associatesreproducibility trainingintroduction to "my laboratory"instruction in responsible conduct of research - postbacs and gpp studentsresources for training directorsannual review of ethics (case studies)research cases for use by the nih communityprocesses for authorship dispute resolutiongovernment ethicsguidelines for non-ftes (trainees) for nih-related activities, outside activities, and awardsbioethicsmentoring & trainingguide to training and mentoringguidelines for mentors at nihguidelines for trainees at nihguidelines for annual progress review of traineesscientific director policy updates for mentors and traineesgoals for enhanced mentoring in the irpfelcom mentoring committeethe ddir implementation plan in response to the felcom subcommittee report on mentoringmentoring cases for discussionssubmitting research publicationspubmed central (pmc) deposition requirementsintramural directions for submitting to pubmed central via nihmsnih publishing agreement formsprocedures for non-peer-reviewed publicationspublication and abstract clearanceintramural research communications & resourcesannual reports and bibliographiesintramural program on research on women's healthwalsabout wals & its named lecturescurrent lecture seasonpast lecture seasons & speakersbrowse by seasonbrowse by speakernamed & honorific lecturesnih director’s lecturerolla e.
Lecturespecial lecturenominationspostdoc lunchcontinuing medical education creditsnih research festivalthe nih research festival is the showcase for intramural research; join us september 14–16, 2016visit websitethe nih catalysta publication for and about the nih intramural research communityvisit websitesigsview by nameview by scientific focus areanidbthe nih intramural database collects and disseminates information about research being performed in the intramural programsvisit review of ethics (case studies). For additional information, please visit resources for research ethics education research ethics cases are a tool for discussing scientific integrity. Cases are designed to confront the readers with a specific problem that does not lend itself to easy answers.
By providing a focus for discussion, cases help staff involved in research to define or refine their own standards, to appreciate alternative approaches to identifying and resolving ethical problems, and to develop skills for dealing with hard problems on their own. Research ethics cases for use by the nih community theme 17 - socially responsible science (2017) theme 16 - research reproducibility (2016) theme 15 - authorship and collaborative science (2015) theme 14 - differentiating between honest discourse and research misconduct and introduction to enhancing reproducibility (2014) theme 13 - data management, whistleblowers, and nepotism (2013) theme 12 - mentoring (2012) theme 11 - authorship (2011) theme 10 - science and social responsibility, continued (2010) theme 9 - science and social responsibility - dual use research (2009) theme 8 - borrowing - is it plagiarism? Summarizing both majority and minority opinions at the end of the should cases be analyzed?
It is always unacceptable to have made no reasonable attempt to define a consistent and defensible basis for page was last updated on friday, february 24, 2017 - 11:book search of scientific directorscommittees advisory to the ddirprocesses for reviewing nih intramural scienceintramural program oversightintramural administrative management councilpersonneltenure in the nih intramural research programawards, fellowships, & grant opportunitiesethical conductresearch ethicsspecial research considerationsresponsible conduct of research traininginstruction in responsible conduct of research - postdoc irta, crta, vf, research associatesinstruction in responsible conduct of research - postbacs and gpp studentsresources for training directorsannual review of ethics (case studies)research cases for use by the nih communityprocesses for authorship dispute resolutiongovernment ethicsbioethicsmentoring & trainingsubmitting research publicationsintramural research communications & pageprint ntact usprivacy policydisclaimeraccessibilitysite of medical ethics wikipedia, the free to: navigation, cases have been remarkable for starting broad discussion and for setting precedent in medical ethics. 1] the national commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research in 1977 endorsed the continued limited use of psychosurgical procedures. None were told the intent of the research, and they believed that they were to receive speech therapy.
14] in another aec study, researchers at the university of nebraska college of medicine fed iodine-131 to 28 healthy infants through a gastric tube to test the concentration of iodine in the infants' thyroid glands. The experiment was conducted in august 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor philip zimbardo. In all of these cases, the subjects did not know what was going on and did not give informed consent.
The man did not authorize the use of his bodily tissues or fluids, and researchers did not obtain informed consent. City, ey is a former pharmacist who owned and operated research medical tower pharmacy in missouri. Miami children's hospital research ts donated tissue samples, which researchers subsequently used in a plan to generate mithkline human 2004 glaxosmithkline (gsk) sponsored at least four medical trials using hispanic and black children at new york's incarnation children's center.
Of minnesota research participant dan sity of minnesota research participant dan markingson committed suicide in may 2004 while enrolled in an industry-sponsored pharmaceutical trial comparing three fda-approved atypical antipsychotics: seroquel (quetiapine), zyprexa (olanzapine), and risperdal (risperidone). Writing on the circumstances surrounding markingson's death in the study, which was designed and funded by seroquel manufacturer astrazeneca, university of minnesota professor of bioethics carl elliott noted that markingson was enrolled in the study against the wishes of his mother, mary weiss, and that he was forced to choose between enrolling in the study or being involuntarily committed to a state mental institution. Olson, oversights and biases in astrazeneca's trial design, and the inadequacy of university institutional review board (irb) protections for research subjects.
Research in the ranks: vulnerable subjects, coercible collaboration, and the hepatitis e vaccine trial in nepal. Miami children's hospital research ch participant y for research subject al research ines for human subject of medical ethics ation of ring in clinical utional review monitoring ity advisory ries: medical ethicslists of lawsuitsmedical controversieshidden categories: webarchive template wayback linkscs1 maint: multiple names: authors logged intalkcontributionscreate accountlog pagecontentsfeatured contentcurrent eventsrandom articledonate to wikipediawikipedia out wikipediacommunity portalrecent changescontact links hererelated changesupload filespecial pagespermanent linkpage informationwikidata itemcite this a bookdownload as pdfprintable page was last edited on 21 october 2017, at 06: is available under the creative commons attribution-sharealike license;. A non-profit case study collection is a database of ethics cases from the fields of science, engineering, the social sciences, and on the following links to launch a search for cases in these subject sible conduct of research research research ch ethics: cases and commentaries is an excellent collection of page-long case studies accompanied by expert ering ethics y and er/employee ectual sional have also put together an annotated bibliography on using case studies for teaching engineering and research ethics, as well as how to write and assess cases for use in the ia for selecting cases have been drawn from all over the web, especially from pages maintained by professional societies and academic institutions.
All case studies included in this collection have been reviewed by csep staff, and include a short description of the case and a link to either a full text version of the case or to its location on a web site maintained by another ethics organization. The majority of the cases have come from the following sites:Association for practical and professional ethics - ethics ethics center of the national academy of engineering (engineering & science). Ethics for research, scholarship, & practice, university of minnesota (research ethics in science and the social sciences).
Dimensions of ethics in science and engineering case studies developed by the science, technology and society initiative at the university of massachusetts amherst (engineering, science). Cases can be searched by keyword, subject, or also invite you to recommend or submit cases that you have developed to be included in the collection. This will search the library for materials on how to use case studies in an ethics course, workshop, or ethics case studies aim to raise awareness of some of the ethics issues that can arise in case studies are listed below under a specific ethics issues category.
However, the actual studies may cover a number of ethics issues and you are advised to look at other studies as these may also highlight issues that they are of your l challenges of ipatory ch with vulnerable ng trust and protecting g with disabled young ity and consent in research with asylum entiality and ch involving harm to entiality of former t and ational udinal research in developing sciences in ed consent working with children internationally (young lives). Data sharing and informants' ng data ulties in depositing in multidisciplinary g in a multi-lingual ch ethics and integrity: case studies (university of sheffield website). Case studies should be no longer than 680 words and include:Brief description of the l process: brief details of the ethics approaches and issues addressed (eg approval routes, guidance followed) including those addressed prior to the start of the grant or any ongoing concerns around to sharing of data and impact y of lessons learned and advice to other link to project's website and/or link grant's page on gateway to research.
